Hi Rui :) Rui Nuno Capela wrote: > of course, a bug in qtractor capture/recording path is not (ever) out of > the question ;) >
I used an audio track, raised the output volume and it sounds fine, recorded it to another track, while the input fader was kept untouched. The loudness changed exactly by the wanted dB, when reducing the new recorded track for exactly what the original track's level was raised, both tracks have an identically loudness, anyway the sound for the new track becomes a little bit muddy. > just having qtractor and jackd running should be the ideal scenario. no > jamin, no plugins, no nothing in between. > This is what I did. > by routing qtractor outputs to inputs and record (bounce) to a new audio > track should be sufficient to expose the trouble. > > i shall do my homework, but it would be awesome if any of you could agree > on a standard setup, like the exact and same jackd command line arguments, > like sample-rate and buffer-size, as also all qtractor audio > capture/playback options, specially the audio sample file format(i would > suggest one with no data loss nor conversion (like wav float 32bit) > $ cat .jackdrc /usr/bin/jackd -R -dalsa -dhw:0 -r96000 -p512 -n2 Playback option was "Best Quality" anything else was unchecked. The .wav was 96 Khz/ 24 Bit. What do you mean with capture options? The input fader e.g. was untouched. Cheers, Ralf _______________________________________________ 64studio-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.64studio.com/mailman/listinfo/64studio-users
