Hi Pascal,
Once we adopt the document and discuss changes in the document by WG, the relevant contributions should be added as a natural process. If you have any particular ideas or anyone you think would be relevant to comment on, please let us know. I am not clear on "many areas" you referred below. Did you mean that the draft should collect input from detnet WG or any other group? Ultimately, we would like BT vendors to adopt the IETF protocol and for that it'd be wise to work closely with BTSIG as you would agree. Thanks, -Samita From: Pascal Thubert (pthubert) [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2016 11:09 AM To: samita Chakrabarti <[email protected]>; 'lo' <[email protected]> Subject: RE: [6lo] Adoption call for draft-gomez-6lo-blemesh Hello Samita: This is a good start and the similar effort at detnet is a success. But it will take multiple (many) contributors from many areas to make it real good. Do we have them? Cheers, Pascal From: 6lo [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of samita Chakrabarti Sent: mercredi 21 septembre 2016 19:48 To: 'lo' <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > Subject: [6lo] Adoption call for draft-gomez-6lo-blemesh Hello All: We have discussed 6lo-blemesh at the IETF 96 6lo meeting and there were interests in the WG to work on this draft. The draft authors also have been requested to check with BTSIG and BTSIG has been consulted. We would like to proceed with the WG adoption call for this document: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gomez-6lo-blemesh/ Please provide your opinion on the mailing list with 'Yes/No' and a short note. The adoption call ends on October 7, 2016. Thanks, Gabriel & Samita 6lo-chairs
_______________________________________________ 6lo mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo
