Hello All.. I support the adoption of this document. We can use existing network topology of each 6lo link layer technologies but it is more better to explore network topology. In the 6lo-blemeth document, it enables IPv6 over BLE networks of a more complex topology than just the typical BLE star topology. I think that this kind of topology can enhance IoT services and use cases.
Best regards. YongGeun. On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 2:48 AM, samita Chakrabarti <samitac.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hello All: > > > > We have discussed 6lo-blemesh at the IETF 96 6lo meeting and there were > interests in the WG to work on this draft. > > The draft authors also have been requested to check with BTSIG and BTSIG > has been consulted. > > > > We would like to proceed with the WG adoption call for this document: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gomez-6lo-blemesh/ > > > > > > Please provide your opinion on the mailing list with ‘Yes/No’ and a short > note. > > > > The adoption call ends on October 7, 2016. > > > > Thanks, > > Gabriel & Samita > > 6lo-chairs > > _______________________________________________ > 6lo mailing list > 6lo@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo > >
_______________________________________________ 6lo mailing list 6lo@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo
