Dear all:

I added some text in section 3 to cover Carles' point about NS vs NA
EARO format. I actually made the 2 figures to illustrate that the Status is
6 bits since RFC 9010.

Le mar. 13 mai 2025 à 07:51, Carles Gomez Montenegro <[email protected]>
a écrit :

> Dear Adnan,
>
> Thanks for your response.
>
> Please find below my inline comments:
>
> On Mon, 12 May 2025 at 15:38, Adnan Rashid <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Dear Carles,
>>
>> Thanks for the review. We will update the draft soon.
>>
>> I have two questions
>>
>> - Figure 1: there are two different bits called 'R'. Please consider
>> renaming the reserved bit with a letter other than 'R'.
>>
>> We used the small letter "r". Please let me know if the IETF/WG is ok
>> with this. if not then suggest any other.
>>
>>
> Do you mean you are considering to use "r" in the update you are
> preparing, and for the "reserved" bit?
>
> Well, "r" is better than the previous "R", but I am unsure if it is
> sufficiently different. Once I used "V" (from "reserVed"), but we are
> entering some subjective realm here.
>
>
>> As we update RFC 8928, should we explicitly notify readers about the
>> previously incorrect caption name 'Enhanced Address Registration Option'
>> and clarify that the correct term is 'Extended Address Registration Option
>> (EARO)'? If yes then we will update it in Section 3.
>>
>>
> I don't think so. The term is actually the same either way, and once the
> acronym EARO has been defined in the main text, then I understand it is not
> strictly necessary to define it again in a figure caption. Nevertheless,
> the RFC Editor will eventually address this if necessary (e.g., if there
> are special rules for acronyms in figure captions I am not aware of).
>
> Cheers,
>
> Carles
>
>
>> On Tue, 29 Apr 2025 at 16:38, Shwetha <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> This email initiates a Working Group Last Call (WGLC) for
>> draft-ietf-6lo-updating-rfc-8928-01 [1]. The Last Call will run for 2
>> weeks, ending on Wednesday, May 14, 2025.
>>
>> This document updates RFC 8928 [2], “Address-Protected Neighbor Discovery
>> for Low-Power and Lossy Networks” (AP-ND), by updating the bit
>> position for the C-flag and registering it with IANA.
>> The authors have addressed the initial set of comments received since the
>> draft was adopted.
>>
>> Please send your comments, feedback, and reviews to the mailing list
>> before the end of the Last Call.
>>
>> Thank you!
>> Carles and Shwetha
>>
>> [1]
>> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-6lo-updating-rfc-8928-01.txt
>> [2] https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8928.txt
>>
>> Informativa Privacy - Ai sensi del Regolamento (UE) 2016/679 si precisa
>> che le informazioni contenute in questo messaggio sono riservate e ad uso
>> esclusivo del destinatario. Qualora il messaggio in parola Le fosse
>> pervenuto per errore, La preghiamo di eliminarlo senza copiarlo e di non
>> inoltrarlo a terzi, dandocene gentilmente comunicazione. Grazie. Privacy
>> Information - This message, for the Regulation (UE) 2016/679, may contain
>> confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the addressee or
>> authorized to receive this for the addressee, you must not use, copy,
>> disclose or take any action based on this message or any information
>> herein. If you have received this message in error, please advise the
>> sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message. Thank you for
>> your cooperation.
>>
>
All the best

-- 
Pascal
_______________________________________________
6lo mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to