+1 (co-author hat off) This is sufficiently different from 802.15.4 and without specification hard to make interoperable between vendors. Furthermore, I believe having a specification for 6lowpan over (something other than 802.15.4) will be a great thing for the whole community.
Zach On Mar 31, 2011, at 8:53 PM, Carsten Bormann wrote: > On Mar 31, 2011, at 19:47, Carsten Bormann wrote: > >> It appears I was a bit quick dismissing BT-LE as a working group item during >> Tuesday's 6LoWPAN meeting. The WG is alive and well, so we can very well >> request the addition of milestones. As the support in the room for working >> on the adaptation of 6LoWPAN for BT-LE was quite good, I'm now issuing a >> call for WG adoption. >> >> This is a call for working group adoption of >> draft-patil-6lowpan-v6over-btle-01.txt >> >> Working group adoption does not mean we agree with every detail of the >> draft, but that we want to use it as the basis of further working group >> work. >> >> Please reply to the list until >> >> Friday, April 8, 23:59 UTC >> >> with your position whether this document should be adopted or not. >> >> Gruesse, Carsten > > _______________________________________________ > 6lowpan mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan -- Zach Shelby, Chief Nerd, Sensinode Ltd. http://zachshelby.org - My blog "On the Internet of Things" http://6lowpan.net - My book "6LoWPAN: The Wireless Embedded Internet" Mobile: +358 40 7796297
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ 6lowpan mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
