+1
> +1 (if I-D editor view counts) > > On 3/31/11 12:53 PM, "ext Carsten Bormann" <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> Re: [6lowpan] WG adoption of 6lowpan Implementers guide > > > >That's what you get when you edit one message out of another. > >It's been a long week... > >Of course, this is about the BT-LE draft, not about the implementers > >guide. > >Please make sure you reply with the subject of this message, in > >particular if it is just a "+1"... > > > >Sorry for the confusion, > >Carsten > > > >On Mar 31, 2011, at 19:47, Carsten Bormann wrote: > > > >> It appears I was a bit quick dismissing BT-LE as a working group item > >>during Tuesday's 6LoWPAN meeting. The WG is alive and well, so we can > >>very well request the addition of milestones. As the support in the > >>room for working on the adaptation of 6LoWPAN for BT-LE was quite good, > >>I'm now issuing a call for WG adoption. > >> > >> This is a call for working group adoption of > >> draft-patil-6lowpan-v6over-btle-01.txt > >> > >> Working group adoption does not mean we agree with every detail of the > >> draft, but that we want to use it as the basis of further working group > >> work. > >> > >> Please reply to the list until > >> > >> Friday, April 8, 23:59 UTC > >> > >> with your position whether this document should be adopted or not. > >> > >> Gruesse, Carsten > > > >_______________________________________________ > >6lowpan mailing list > >[email protected] > >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan > > _______________________________________________ > 6lowpan mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan > _______________________________________________ 6lowpan mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
