+1 (if I-D editor view counts) On 3/31/11 12:53 PM, "ext Carsten Bormann" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Re: [6lowpan] WG adoption of 6lowpan Implementers guide > >That's what you get when you edit one message out of another. >It's been a long week... >Of course, this is about the BT-LE draft, not about the implementers >guide. >Please make sure you reply with the subject of this message, in >particular if it is just a "+1"... > >Sorry for the confusion, >Carsten > >On Mar 31, 2011, at 19:47, Carsten Bormann wrote: > >> It appears I was a bit quick dismissing BT-LE as a working group item >>during Tuesday's 6LoWPAN meeting. The WG is alive and well, so we can >>very well request the addition of milestones. As the support in the >>room for working on the adaptation of 6LoWPAN for BT-LE was quite good, >>I'm now issuing a call for WG adoption. >> >> This is a call for working group adoption of >> draft-patil-6lowpan-v6over-btle-01.txt >> >> Working group adoption does not mean we agree with every detail of the >> draft, but that we want to use it as the basis of further working group >> work. >> >> Please reply to the list until >> >> Friday, April 8, 23:59 UTC >> >> with your position whether this document should be adopted or not. >> >> Gruesse, Carsten > >_______________________________________________ >6lowpan mailing list >[email protected] >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan _______________________________________________ 6lowpan mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
