That's true too Michael, but it is not ours pec, just the normal ND over transit links. Cheers, Pascal
> -----Original Message----- > From: Michael Richardson [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: vendredi 23 février 2018 19:56 > To: Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <[email protected]> > Cc: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <[email protected]>; > [email protected] > Subject: Re: [6tisch] [Roll] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-thubert- > roll-unaware-leaves-02.txt > > > Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <[email protected]> wrote: > > If the 'R' flag is not set, then the Registering Node is expected to be > a RPL > > router that handles the reachability of the Registered Address by > itself. > > This document also specifies a keep-alive EDAR message that the RPL > Root may > > use to maintain an existing state in the 6LBR upon receiving DAO > messages. > > The EDAR message may only act as a refresher and can only update the > Lifetime > > and the TID of the state in the 6LBR. A RPL router SHOULD NOT set the > 'R' flag. > > Can we also say that a 6LR, upon seeing a ND *without* the EARO option, > should assume it's like the R flag is set? Or is such a node just > non-operable? > (Clearly, such a node can't move from DODAG to DODAG...) > > -- > Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works > -= IPv6 IoT consulting =- > > _______________________________________________ 6tisch mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch
