-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
<snip>
> In my opinion, it's more important to focus on the technical specs at
> this point than the architecture document. We definitely should have
This was already discussed in Quebec and the WG concluded that were
fine with Elliot putting the architecture document on the back-burner
for a little while while the core technical spec was moved ahead.
I don't think we need to re-iterate that decision.
> some update by IETF 82 to make forward prograss, but I don't think it is
> critical that it be complete. In effect I'm arguing that the initial
> order of our milestones is wrong and that we want to conclude core specs
> before architecture.
Yes. cf above.
Cheers Leif
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAk58lGgACgkQ8Jx8FtbMZnd8ZQCgp491JhYednEnz0vTmgH1dDd9
TCwAniv9Y2/6pEH1tWwmUBOoEC3MFQGt
=v+DN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
abfab mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/abfab
