>>>>> "Cantor," == Cantor, Scott <[email protected]> writes:
Cantor,> And doing an binding at OASIS is only of interest to me if
Cantor,> it's sufficiently generic. I'm not sure yet whether this
Cantor,> work is going to be sensibly of use to carry arbitrary SAML
Cantor,> protocols. It still feels use case (or profile-) specific
Cantor,> to me.
I agree. I think we're explicitly making it profile specific.
_______________________________________________
abfab mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/abfab
