-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 09/23/2011 09:44 PM, Sam Hartman wrote:
>>>>>> "Cantor," == Cantor, Scott <[email protected]> writes:
>
>
> Cantor,> And doing an binding at OASIS is only of interest to me if
> Cantor,> it's sufficiently generic. I'm not sure yet whether this
> Cantor,> work is going to be sensibly of use to carry arbitrary SAML
> Cantor,> protocols. It still feels use case (or profile-) specific
> Cantor,> to me.
>
> I agree. I think we're explicitly making it profile specific.
OK so our charter doesn't say we absolutely have to do a binding in
OASIS SSTC as long as we coordinate with that group.
Scott and Thomas - do you think we can ask the SSTC to review?
Cheers Leif
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAk585S0ACgkQ8Jx8FtbMZnc03gCfQ/LBej4y/ND9i/gsPzoIQ5nt
D0IAnAgkRzVeeiO0UsES8wb8p/HgvayV
=nUyK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
abfab mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/abfab
