Rafa Marin Lopez wrote: > I was wondering what would happen if a current deployment is not using > radsec. Is it not too much restrictive to set MUST for radsec?. (In fact, as > you mention, it is an experimental RFC)
My $0.02 is that most RADIUS deployments should be moving to RadSec, or RADIUS over DTLS. The security of the RADIUS protocol requires it. If a new implementation understands SAML, it can do RadSec, too. Alan DeKok. _______________________________________________ abfab mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/abfab
