>>>>> "Alan" == Alan DeKok <[email protected]> writes:
Alan> Rafa Marin Lopez wrote:
>> I was wondering what would happen if a current deployment is not
>> using radsec. Is it not too much restrictive to set MUST for
>> radsec?. (In fact, as you mention, it is an experimental RFC)
Alan> My $0.02 is that most RADIUS deployments should be moving to
Alan> RadSec, or RADIUS over DTLS. The security of the RADIUS
Alan> protocol requires it.
The Moonshot implementation of ABFAB has always supported RADSEC.
I know that the UM team had an early deployment of AABFAB; I don't know
if that supported RADSEC or not.
_______________________________________________
abfab mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/abfab
