On 09/11/12 16:23, Sam Hartman wrote: >>>>>> "Alan" == Alan DeKok <[email protected]> writes: > Alan> Rafa Marin Lopez wrote: > >> I was wondering what would happen if a current deployment is not > >> using radsec. Is it not too much restrictive to set MUST for > >> radsec?. (In fact, as you mention, it is an experimental RFC) > > Alan> My $0.02 is that most RADIUS deployments should be moving to > Alan> RadSec, or RADIUS over DTLS. The security of the RADIUS > Alan> protocol requires it. > > The Moonshot implementation of ABFAB has always supported RADSEC. > > I know that the UM team had an early deployment of AABFAB; I don't know > if that supported RADSEC or not. Actually not, it runs over Radius. Although it is just a matter of implementation.
regards, Gabi. > _______________________________________________ > abfab mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/abfab _______________________________________________ abfab mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/abfab
