>>>>> "Gabriel" == Gabriel Lopez <[email protected]> writes:
Gabriel> On 09/11/12 16:23, Sam Hartman wrote:
>>>>>>> "Alan" == Alan DeKok <[email protected]> writes:
Alan> Rafa Marin Lopez wrote:
>> >> I was wondering what would happen if a current deployment is
>> not >> using radsec. Is it not too much restrictive to set MUST
>> for >> radsec?. (In fact, as you mention, it is an experimental
>> RFC)
>>
Alan> My $0.02 is that most RADIUS deployments should be moving to
Alan> RadSec, or RADIUS over DTLS. The security of the RADIUS
Alan> protocol requires it.
>>
>> The Moonshot implementation of ABFAB has always supported RADSEC.
>>
>> I know that the UM team had an early deployment of AABFAB; I
>> don't know if that supported RADSEC or not.
Gabriel> Actually not, it runs over Radius. Although it is just a
Gabriel> matter of implementation.
OK, so you would not be concerned about a radsec requirement on behalf
of the MU implementation?
_______________________________________________
abfab mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/abfab
