>
> > Well, it depends on what Frodo wants. The options are:
> >
>> 1) use UT_strdup in our version of psiconv, and thus have them forked
>> (if only slightly), assuming he doesn't want to include our util code.
>>
>> 2) use something other than strdup in the main tree of psiconv.
>>
>
>If Frodo really cared about portability he would write his own
>"strdup()" function and use it instead.
He can probably borrow the implementation we have in AbiWord :-)
But this scares me as this would duplicate code. Perhaps finding a
way to combine both, ie use its own strdup if none is available, but
use UT_strdup if we compile psiconv within AbiWord :-))
Hub
