At 04:14 PM 3/23/01 -0500, Dom Lachowicz wrote: >>I don't think this is correct. If I insert an object, no matter what kind, >>it's in my mind definitely two different words before and after this >>object. >>To merge these into one word seems to resemble stenography, and I'm not >>sure >>that's a job for AbiWord. :-) > >I can agree with this. It'll be a little difficult to implement, but totally >doable. Really? I would have thought we could just return true for OBJECT from UT_isWordDelimiter(). What am I missing? Paul
- Re: spelling images and fields Paul Rohr
- Re: spelling images and fields jskov
- Re: spelling images and fields Paul Rohr
- Re: spelling images and fields (was Re: Commit... Tomas Frydrych
- Re: Commit: fix that spelling + images bug WJCarpenter
- Re: Commit: fix that spelling + images bug Dom Lachowicz
- Re: Commit: fix that spelling + images bug Dom Lachowicz
- Re: Commit: fix that spelling + images bug Paul Rohr
- Re: Commit: fix that spelling + images bug WJCarpenter
- Re: Commit: fix that spelling + images bug WJCarpenter
- Re: Commit: fix that spelling + images bug Paul Rohr
- Re: Commit: fix that spelling + images bug WJCarpenter
- Re: Commit: fix that spelling + images bug Paul Rohr
- Re: Commit: fix that spelling + image... Tomas Frydrych
- Re: Commit: fix that spelling + i... WJCarpenter
- no locale fallbacks for dictionar... Paul Rohr
- RE: no locale fallbacks for dicti... WJCarpenter
- Re: Commit: fix that spelling + images bug WJCarpenter
