Re: spelling images and fields (was Re: Commit: fix that spelling + images bug)

[Tomas Frydrych]

> Tomas> I fail to see the need to spellcheck fields, we are not going
> Tomas> to allow spelling errors into the output of our fields, or are
> Tomas> we?
> 
> I didn't say that :)   The problem is caused by the fact that Images
> and Fields are identified as "objects" in the backend. 
> 
> So my suggestion was to translate these to two different unicodes.
> See 'case pf_Frag::PFT_Object:' in pt_PieceTable::getBlockBuf. That
> needs to check the sub-types of the PFT_Object and translate
> accordingly.
I am just questioning whether PFT_Object really needs to be 
treated as anything else than whitespace.

Tomas