I wonder if this is semantically captured by IA2_RELATION_CONTROLLER_FOR? Not sure there is any harm to distinguishing POPUP_INITIATOR_FOR though (or maybe POPPER_FOR).
cheers, D On 25/02/10 9:23 AM, Pete Brunet wrote: > I can add IA2_RELATION_NODE_PARENT_OF. > > I just checked the list of relations and there is one other one that > doesn't have a complement, i.e. IA2_RELATION_POPUP_FOR which is defined as: > This object is a transient component related to the target object. > When this object is activated the target object doesn't loose focus. > Is there any need for its complement, e.g. something like > IA2_RELATION_POPUP_INITIATOR_FOR? > > Pete > --- > James Teh wrote: > >> On 10/11/2009 3:28 PM, Alexander Surkov wrote: >> >>> Joanmarie requested us to implement new RELATION_NODE_PARENT_OF in >>> Firefox for ATK - https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=527461. >>> This relation is reciprocal relation to NODE_CHILD_OF. I wonder if AT >>> using IA2 are interested to have this relation as well. On the another >>> hand new relation will keep IA2 and ATK more closely what is good in >>> general. >>> >> While NVDA doesn't really have a use for this at present, I think it >> makes sense for the sake of symmetry if nothing else. >> >> Jamie >> > _______________________________________________ > Accessibility-ia2 mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/accessibility-ia2 > _______________________________________________ Accessibility-ia2 mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/accessibility-ia2
