Nope. controller for indicates that an object controls another elsewhere in
the application. This was derived from the work we did with Sun on Java
where we had a problem in the SwingSet application. Here we had a series of
checkboxes that controlled the contents of a listbox (types of foods). We
had no way of showing the relationship so we created controller for.

for pop-up we had a has popup for aria that had an IA2 relationship
corresponding to it. Wouldn't you have an IA2_RELATION_HAS_POPUP?

Rich

Rich Schwerdtfeger
Distinguished Engineer, SWG Accessibility Architect/Strategist


                                                                       
             David Bolter                                              
             <david.bol...@gma                                         
             il.com>                                                    To
             Sent by:                  accessibility-...@lists.linuxfounda
             accessibility-ia2         tion.org                        
             -boun...@lists.li                                          cc
             nuxfoundation.org                                         
                                                                   Subject
                                       Re: [Accessibility-ia2]         
             02/25/2010 02:54          RELATION_NODE_PARENT_OF         
             PM                                                        
                                                                       
                                                                       
                                                                       
                                                                       
                                                                       




I wonder if this is semantically captured by IA2_RELATION_CONTROLLER_FOR?

Not sure there is any harm to distinguishing POPUP_INITIATOR_FOR though
(or maybe POPPER_FOR).

cheers,
D
On 25/02/10 9:23 AM, Pete Brunet wrote:
> I can add IA2_RELATION_NODE_PARENT_OF.
>
> I just checked the list of relations and there is one other one that
> doesn't have a complement, i.e.  IA2_RELATION_POPUP_FOR which is defined
as:
>    This object is a transient component related to the target object.
> When this object is activated the target object doesn't loose focus.
> Is there any need for its complement, e.g. something like
> IA2_RELATION_POPUP_INITIATOR_FOR?
>
> Pete
> ---
> James Teh wrote:
>
>> On 10/11/2009 3:28 PM, Alexander Surkov wrote:
>>
>>> Joanmarie requested us to implement new RELATION_NODE_PARENT_OF in
>>> Firefox for ATK - https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=527461.
>>> This relation is reciprocal relation to NODE_CHILD_OF. I wonder if AT
>>> using IA2 are interested to have this relation as well. On the another
>>> hand new relation will keep IA2 and ATK more closely what is good in
>>> general.
>>>
>> While NVDA doesn't really have a use for this at present, I think it
>> makes sense for the sake of symmetry if nothing else.
>>
>> Jamie
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Accessibility-ia2 mailing list
> Accessibility-ia2@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/accessibility-ia2
>

_______________________________________________
Accessibility-ia2 mailing list
Accessibility-ia2@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/accessibility-ia2

<<inline: graycol.gif>>

<<inline: pic32237.gif>>

<<inline: ecblank.gif>>

_______________________________________________
Accessibility-ia2 mailing list
Accessibility-ia2@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/accessibility-ia2

Reply via email to