Richard,
Actually, if memory serves, I introduced this as a way to express
relationships in spreadsheets. Thus you could find out in a
spreadsheet showing quarterly gross expenses, costs, net revenue, and
results, that a given cell (say the lower right, total net for the
year) was derived from the quarterly net results; or derived from the
yearly total gross minus the yearly total costs; etc. etc.
Regards,
Peter Korn
Accessibility Principal
Oracle
Nope. controller for indicates that an object controls another
elsewhere in the application. This was derived from the work we did
with Sun on Java where we had a problem in the SwingSet application.
Here we had a series of checkboxes that controlled the contents of a
listbox (types of foods). We had no way of showing the relationship so
we created controller for.
for pop-up we had a has popup for aria that had an IA2 relationship
corresponding to it. Wouldn't you have an IA2_RELATION_HAS_POPUP?
Rich
Rich Schwerdtfeger
Distinguished Engineer, SWG Accessibility Architect/Strategist
 David Bolter
---02/25/2010 02:56:41 PM---I wonder if this is semantically captured
by IA2_RELATION_CONTROLLER_FOR?
I wonder if this is semantically captured by
IA2_RELATION_CONTROLLER_FOR?
Not sure there is any harm to distinguishing POPUP_INITIATOR_FOR though
(or maybe POPPER_FOR).
cheers,
D
On 25/02/10 9:23 AM, Pete Brunet wrote:
> I can add IA2_RELATION_NODE_PARENT_OF.
>
> I just checked the list of relations and there is one other one
that
> doesn't have a complement, i.e. IA2_RELATION_POPUP_FOR which is
defined as:
> This object is a transient component related to the target
object.
> When this object is activated the target object doesn't loose
focus.
> Is there any need for its complement, e.g. something like
> IA2_RELATION_POPUP_INITIATOR_FOR?
>
> Pete
> ---
> James Teh wrote:
>
>> On 10/11/2009 3:28 PM, Alexander Surkov wrote:
>>
>>> Joanmarie requested us to implement new
RELATION_NODE_PARENT_OF in
>>> Firefox for ATK - https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=527461.
>>> This relation is reciprocal relation to NODE_CHILD_OF. I
wonder if AT
>>> using IA2 are interested to have this relation as well. On
the another
>>> hand new relation will keep IA2 and ATK more closely what
is good in
>>> general.
>>>
>> While NVDA doesn't really have a use for this at present, I
think it
>> makes sense for the sake of symmetry if nothing else.
>>
>> Jamie
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Accessibility-ia2 mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/accessibility-ia2
>
_______________________________________________
Accessibility-ia2 mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/accessibility-ia2
_______________________________________________
Accessibility-ia2 mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/accessibility-ia2
|
_______________________________________________
Accessibility-ia2 mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/accessibility-ia2
