If the role is IA2_ROLE_TEXT_FRAMEthen can the AT just ignore the state 
bit ?

Car



From:
Richard Schwerdtfeger/Austin/i...@ibmus
To:
Andres Gonzalez <[email protected]>
Cc:
"[email protected]" 
<[email protected]>, 
"[email protected]" 
<[email protected]>, Carolyn MacLeod 
<[email protected]>
Date:
13/04/2010 11:51 AM
Subject:
RE: [Accessibility-ia2] Deprecation of IA2_STATE_SINGLE_LINE


Andres,

Let's put the bits saved aside for a moment - we are living with that 
because Microsoft hacked states back in '95. I don't see how we can assume 
single line for a compound document. 

For text roles we have:

IA2_ROLE_TEXT_FRAME: Collection of objects that constitute a logical text 
entity. 
ROLE_SYSTEM_TEXT: The object represents selectable text that allows edits 
or is designated read-only. 

In a compound document, unless you have an embedded text form field, you 
don't really have a notion of single or multi-line. 

Rich 


Rich Schwerdtfeger
CTO Accessibility Software Group




Andres Gonzalez <[email protected]> 
04/13/2010 09:11 AM

To
Richard Schwerdtfeger/Austin/i...@ibmus, Carolyn MacLeod 
<[email protected]>
cc
"[email protected]" 
<[email protected]>, 
"[email protected]" 
<[email protected]>
Subject
RE: [Accessibility-ia2] Deprecation of IA2_STATE_SINGLE_LINE






Rich and all: I think we are essentially agreeing :
1. The multiline state is intended for text fields, where it is important 
for a client to handle line breaks in sync with the app. The API, however, 
does not preclude a server from setting the multiline state for other 
roles.
2. At any particular time, a text field can only be either multiline or 
single line, not both. An object can transition from one state to the 
other, like a text field that expands as you enter more text on it, e.g., 
email header fields in some email clients.
For those reasons, I believe it is possible to declare only one bit flag 
for the multiline state in the API, and assume that the absence of the bit 
means single line, just as it is done for the checked/unchecked state. The 
advantage is to save one bit of a 32-bit constant for a better use. It is 
a purely implementation gain, does not affect the semantics of the API.
 
If someone needs to have two bits to signal multi or single line 
independently for roles other than text fields, or in any other scenario 
in general, then we should keep both, but I haven't heard that scenario 
yet. Thanks,
 
--Andres.
 
 

From: [email protected] [
mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
Richard Schwerdtfeger
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 6:32 AM
To: Carolyn MacLeod
Cc: [email protected]; 
[email protected]
Subject: Re: [Accessibility-ia2] Deprecation of IA2_STATE_SINGLE_LINE

Sure. A web browser. Single and multi line were originally designed for 
text fields and text areas. Single and multi line should only be used for 
content that is only text and has defined line breaks. If neither of these 
properties are provided you will have document with embedded text, etc.

... I mean you could call a browser multi line text area but it really is 
not. It is a compound document. 


Rich Schwerdtfeger
CTO Accessibility Software Group

Carolyn MacLeod---04/12/2010 10:54:42 AM---Hi, Rich. You said:

Carolyn MacLeod/Ottawa/i...@ibmca 
04/12/2010 10:54 AM



To

Richard Schwerdtfeger/Austin/i...@ibmus

cc

[email protected], 
[email protected], David Bolter 
<[email protected]>

Subject

Re: [Accessibility-ia2] Deprecation of IA2_STATE_SINGLE_LINE




Hi, Rich.

You said:
> In documents it may mean neither single or multi-line.

Can you give an example of a document that is neither single-line nor 
multi-line?

You also said:
> This really that trivial for documents.

Did you mean "This really isn't that trivial for documents." ?

Thanks!
Car


Richard Schwerdtfeger---11/04/2010 06:17:38 AM---Single line means that it 
is a single line *text field*. Will there be a problem in office applicati


From:

Richard Schwerdtfeger/Austin/i...@ibmus

To:

Carolyn MacLeod <[email protected]>

Cc:

[email protected], 
[email protected], David Bolter 
<[email protected]>

Date:

11/04/2010 06:17 AM

Subject:

Re: [Accessibility-ia2] Deprecation of IA2_STATE_SINGLE_LINE


Single line means that it is a single line *text field*. Will there be a 
problem in office applications where editable text is applied? ... is it 
really a single or multi-line as it is a document? In other words, is 
there an issue if we assume single line? In documents it may mean neither 
single or multi-line. 

If we delete it we will also have a conflict with ATK and Java which have 
single and multi-line:

http://library.gnome.org/devel/atk/unstable/atk-AtkState.html#AtkStateType
http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/api/javax/accessibility/AccessibleState.html


It is been a long time but the purpose for single line and multiple line 
was to help ATs with Braille devices to know whether to break up the text, 
by line , for a text field. Obviously, a text field that is single line is 
rather easy to deal with. When You use mult-line you know to break up each 
line of text by rows. This really that trivial for documents.


Rich Schwerdtfeger
CTO Accessibility Software Group


Carolyn MacLeod ---04/09/2010 04:52:07 PM---Isn't role pretty much always 
the first thing an AT asks any accessible object?

Carolyn MacLeod <[email protected]> 
Sent by: [email protected] 
04/09/2010 04:42 PM



To

David Bolter <[email protected]>

cc

[email protected]

Subject

Re: [Accessibility-ia2] Deprecation of IA2_STATE_SINGLE_LINE






Isn't role pretty much always the first thing an AT asks any accessible 
object? 

Carolyn 




Re: [Accessibility-ia2] Deprecation of IA2_STATE_SINGLE_LINE


David Bolter 
to: 
accessibility-ia2 
04/09/2010 03:11 PM



Sent by: 
[email protected]








The only concern I have is that Firefox has exposed it for a while; 
although that doesn't necessarily stop deprecation. Also I think 
Alexander's point is valid here: 
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg00185.html


Is it perhaps easier for AT to just check the state bit, rather than the 
role as well?

cheers,
David

On 09/04/10 2:33 PM, Carolyn MacLeod wrote: 
Going once, going twice.... ?

I need to decide whether or not to delete the single-line state bit from 
the Eclipse API before April 30.

Carolyn



From:
Pete Brunet <[email protected]>
To:
IA2 List <[email protected]>
Date:
26/03/2010 09:21 AM
Subject:
[Accessibility-ia2] Deprecation of IA2_STATE_SINGLE_LINE
Sent by:
[email protected]



The following is (slightly edited) from Carolyn, who is implementing IA2 
in Eclipse...

Back in the fall, Andres asked why IA2 provides both IA2_STATE_MULTI_LINE 
and  IA2_STATE_SINGLE_LINE state bits.

http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg00173.html



They would seem to be mutually exclusive, and having both takes up a 
precious bit in the 32-bit strip.
Is there ever a case where an object can be neither single-line nor 
multi-line?
Is there ever a case where an object can be both single-line and 
multi-line?

In the conversation on the ia2 list, Jamie said that he had never even 
noticed the single-line bit.

This is a possible source of error, for example if an application only 
notices and sets/clears the "single" bit, but the AT only looks at the 
"multi" bit.

The list discussion kind of ended with "oh well, whatever".

I propose deprecating IA2_STATE_SINGLE_LINE.  Any objections?




_______________________________________________
Accessibility-ia2 mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/accessibility-ia2

_______________________________________________
Accessibility-ia2 mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/accessibility-ia2
_______________________________________________
Accessibility-ia2 mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/accessibility-ia2




<<image/gif>>

<<image/gif>>

<<image/gif>>

<<image/gif>>

<<image/gif>>

<<image/gif>>

<<image/gif>>

<<image/gif>>

<<image/gif>>

<<image/gif>>

<<image/gif>>

<<image/gif>>

<<image/gif>>

<<image/gif>>

<<image/gif>>

<<image/gif>>

<<image/gif>>

<<image/gif>>

<<image/gif>>

<<image/gif>>

<<image/gif>>

<<image/gif>>

<<image/gif>>

<<image/gif>>

<<image/gif>>

<<image/gif>>

<<image/gif>>

<<image/gif>>

<<image/gif>>

<<image/gif>>

<<image/gif>>

<<image/gif>>

_______________________________________________
Accessibility-ia2 mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/accessibility-ia2

Reply via email to