Jamie, are you good with 1) adding IA2_ROLE_LANDMARK and 2) deprecating IA2_ROLE_FORM?
Thanks. Alex. On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 11:04 AM, Joseph Scheuhammer <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2016-04-18 10:41 AM, Rich Schwerdtfeger wrote: > > > > So, this is pretty much what I expected. The net is you should use the > > new IA2 landmark role vs. the Form role for newer versions of firefox > > (along with exposing the xml-roles=“form”) in newer versions of > > Firefox and this should be reflected in the Core mapping spec. > > > > To be concrete: the current MSAA+IA2 mapping of role="form" is to map it > to IA2_ROLE_FORM [1]. Is the suggestion to change that to > IA2_ROLE_LANDMARK + xml-roles:"form"? > > If so, are the other platforms affected? I imagine for > interoperability, you would want ATK/AT-SPI to change from ROLE_FORM to > ROLE_LANDMARK. > > UIA seems to have it covered, in that they store both a Control type > (Group) and a Landmark Type (form) -- does that remain unchanged? > > [1] https://w3c.github.io/aria/core-aam/core-aam.html#role-map-form > > -- > ;;;;joseph. > > 'Die Wahrheit ist Irgendwo da Draußen. Wieder.' > - C. Carter - > >
_______________________________________________ Accessibility-ia2 mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/accessibility-ia2
