yes! you are absolutely right!  private telecommunication sector is growing
very fast, they are earning billions, why only BSNL and MTNL provide
consessional telephone facility? why not private telecom service providers?
big organisations for the blind should take this matter with TRAI!

----- Original Message -----
From: "Chetan Sharma" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2006 1:47 PM
Subject: Re: [AI] Who should pay for concessions?


> Hi rajive,
>
> Yes, corporations are supposed to behave in a socially responsible manner
> and I believe they will, if we can persuade and exert enough pressure on
> them. Primarily, they  are for profit, but they are not only for profit.
If
> they are earning billions from this society, is it not their duty to
> contribute positively to the society? However, one should always be
> reasonable while  expecting or demanding any concession.I am not
suggesting
> that government has no responsibility, but fast immerging private sector
> should not be allowed to presume that providing concessions is the job of
> the government and they have nothing to do with it. If this is allowed to
> happen, it will result in to more  socially irresponsible behavior of the
> corporate world. In my opinion both private and public sectors should be
> involved in this process.
>
> Regards,
>
>
> Chetan Sharma
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "disability rights initiative" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2006 1:10 PM
> Subject: Re: [AI] Who should pay for concessions?
>
>
> > subramani, kiran,
> > this is indeed the big question. our constitution mandates the
government,
> > as the largest caretaker, to provide education, housing, transportation,
> > medical health facilities and the like.   in providing for these the
> > disabled have been systematically excluded as their needs were not
> > considered when these facilities came up and we found ourselves excluded
> > in
> > education as schools and colleges are inaccessible and so is the
transport
> > system and the health system. for these reasons, and to bring pwds on a
> > equal footing the government has come up with concessions so as to now
> > include pwds in an otherwise inaccessible environment. now, as we
> > privitise
> > and the governments role reduces these huge corporations  which move
into
> > private hands and which are still inaccessible who takes on the
> > responsibility of concessions? here , i feel, the role of corporate
social
> > responsibility comes in as
> > corporates have control of resources and intervene in  many  areas of
> > social
> > life. Corporates have a responsibility towards society and whilst they
are
> > driven by profits  they must also  be made to serve society. under these
> > circumstances now that the private sector will have to deliver what the
> > government did earlier it becomes the responsibility of the private
sector
> > to continue with the concessions until all systems develop to include
> > disabled. in a situation where all needs are met concessions may be
> > withdrawn and until then the role as a concession giver just moves on
from
> > the government to the private sector. will this happen?
> >
> > regards
> >
> > rajive
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Subramani L" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[email protected]>
> > Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2006 10:33 AM
> > Subject: Re: [AI] Who should pay for concessions?
> >
> >
> >> Kiran:
> >>
> >> This's what I exactly argue in my Ph.D thesis. Your point makes perfect
> >> sense.
> >>
> >> Subramani
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kiran Kaja
> >> Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2006 11:34 PM
> >> To: [email protected]
> >> Subject: [AI] Who should pay for concessions?
> >>
> >> ***********************
> >> No virus was detected in the attachment no filename
> >>
> >> Your mail has been scanned by InterScan MSS.
> >> ***********************
> >>
> >>
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> Having followed the thread on DGCA guidelines and the subsequent
> >> discussion
> >> of concessions for the blind or escorts, I have been thinking about it
> >> for a
> >> couple of days.
> >>
> >> I feel that in our country, the existence of public sector in
businesses
> >> like transport and education has benifitted persons with blindness. If
> >> all
> >> the industry and utility services were run by private firms, I don't
> >> imagine
> >> they would come forward with so many concessions and exemptions for us.
> >> Providing concessions is much simpler for public sector or government.
> >> However, this raises a big question of who should eventually pay for
the
> >> concessions?
> >>
> >> As citizens of the country, we are entitled to lead a life which
closely
> >> resembles a sighted or normal person who doesn't have a disability.
This
> >> obviously entails extra expenditure because of various reasons. To
> >> offset
> >> this additional cost, concessions and exemptions are provided. I
> >> strongly
> >> feel that since the government collects taxes from individuals as well
> >> as
> >> businesses in the private sector, it should be the one paying for these
> >> concessions. If the Railways were privatised, the cost of providing
> >> concession to blind persons should be born by the government and not by
> >> the
> >> private company which runs the railways. If a private company
> >> voluntarily
> >> comes forward with concessions, it is a very good gesture on their
part.
> >> But
> >> if concessions are imposed by law, the cost of these concessions should
> >> be
> >> reimbursed.
> >>
> >> For instance, when most of the other passengers of airlines were paying
> >> full
> >> fair for their tickets, blind persons were only paying half. If we put
> >> the
> >> social argument of concession aside for a while, the airline company
was
> >> loozing money by carrying blind passengers. The airline company in
> >> question
> >> also pays the same tax irrespective of offering concessions. So, there
> >> is no
> >> insentive at all for the airline company by carrying blind passengers.
> >> On
> >> the contrary, the company gets less money.
> >>
> >> I think it is the responsibility of the government to provide or pay
for
> >> the
> >> concessions as they should look after the welfare of its citizens.
> >> Private
> >> companies or public sector companies for that matter should never be
> >> forced
> >> to bear the cost of concessions.
> >>
> >> What do you all think about this? I know this is never going to happen
> >> in
> >> India.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Kiran.
> >>
> >>
> >> To unsubscribe send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> with the subject unsubscribe.
> >>
> >> To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes,
> >> please visit the list home page at
> >>
> >>
http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.i
> >> n
> >>
> >>
> >> To unsubscribe send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > with the subject unsubscribe.
> >>
> >> To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes,
> > please visit the list home page at
> >>
> >
http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> No virus found in this incoming message.
> >> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> >> Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.10.7/410 - Release Date:
8/5/2006
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > No virus found in this outgoing message.
> > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.10.8/413 - Release Date: 8/8/2006
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > with the subject unsubscribe.
> >
> > To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes,
> > please visit the list home page at
> >
http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in
>
>
> To unsubscribe send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with the subject unsubscribe.
>
> To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes,
please visit the list home page at
>
http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in
>


DISCLAIMER:
The Information transmitted in this email is solely for the addressee. It is 
confidential and may be legally privileged. Access to this email by anyone else 
is unauthorized. Any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken by 
anyone other than by the intended recipient is prohibited and may be unlawful. 
If you are not the intended recipient then kindly delete the mail from your 
system. Any opinion or views expressed in this mail may not necessarily reflect 
that of Punjab National Bank. The bank considers unencrypted email as an 
insecure mode of communication.

To unsubscribe send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the subject unsubscribe.

To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please 
visit the list home page at
  http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in

Reply via email to