Benjamin Kaduk <ka...@mit.edu> wrote: >> Jim Schaad <i...@augustcellars.com> wrote: >> > In section 2 - There will be a problem in that the port format extension is >> > being eliminated in TLS 1.3 - We may want to divide this into a 1.2 and 1.3 >> > section for clarity. >> >> I don't understand what you are referring to. >> >> What is the "port format extension" you are referring to, and where in >> section 2 do you think we are depending upon it?
> [...] DTLS > implementations MUST use the Supported Elliptic Curves and Supported > Point Formats Extensions [RFC4492]; the uncompressed point format > MUST be supported; [RFC6090] can be used as an implementation method. Ah, so s/port/point/ > The uncompressed point format only exists in (D)TLS 1.2 and lower. > (TLS 1.3 does not separately negotiate point format, rather, the > point format is determined by the group/curve to be used.) I think we were just being overly specific, I'm not sure why. -- ] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [ ] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | network architect [ ] m...@sandelman.ca http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails [ _______________________________________________ Ace mailing list Ace@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace