Benjamin Kaduk <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Jim Schaad <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > In section 2 - There will be a problem in that the port format
extension is
>> > being eliminated in TLS 1.3 - We may want to divide this into a 1.2
and 1.3
>> > section for clarity.
>>
>> I don't understand what you are referring to.
>>
>> What is the "port format extension" you are referring to, and where in
>> section 2 do you think we are depending upon it?
> [...] DTLS
> implementations MUST use the Supported Elliptic Curves and Supported
> Point Formats Extensions [RFC4492]; the uncompressed point format
> MUST be supported; [RFC6090] can be used as an implementation method.
Ah, so s/port/point/
> The uncompressed point format only exists in (D)TLS 1.2 and lower.
> (TLS 1.3 does not separately negotiate point format, rather, the
> point format is determined by the group/curve to be used.)
I think we were just being overly specific, I'm not sure why.
--
] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [
] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | network architect [
] [email protected] http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails [
_______________________________________________
Ace mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace
