On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 2:52 PM, Richard Barnes <[email protected]> wrote: > Hey all, > > I just posted several PRs implementing agreements from the IETF meeting. > > #161 - Drop the OOB challenge > https://github.com/ietf-wg-acme/acme/pull/161
I'm interested in the rationale for dropping the OOB challenge. As it stands, the OOB challenge can be used to indicate that a given domain name (or namespace) is authorized. This would seem to have value for existing CAs who want to offer some level of ACME compatibility but might not be able to make the whole pure-ACME workflow operate in their system. _______________________________________________ Acme mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
