I think this is fine to land now. It's not my favorite approach, but there's clear consensus. I filed Issue #356 [1] to track the lost functionality here, and how we might want to add it back.
https://github.com/ietf-wg-acme/acme/issues/356 On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 3:04 PM, Jacob Hoffman-Andrews <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > Daniel McCarney's been working on PR#342, which changes the new-order > flow to take a list of identifiers instead of a CSR, and to be finalized > with a CSR: https://github.com/ietf-wg-acme/acme/pull/342. We've had > some back-and-forth on the list about this, versus CSR-first, versus > CSR-first-and-last. There was some further discussion at IETF 100 > (minutes: > https://github.com/thomas-fossati/acme-minutes/blob/master/ietf-100.md), > and we hummed to accept PR 342 over the alternatives. > > If there's anyone here who couldn't make it to the meeting and would > like to raise strenuous objections, please speak up now, otherwise we'll > incorporate that change. > > Thanks, > Jacob > > _______________________________________________ > Acme mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme >
_______________________________________________ Acme mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
