Using my editor's prerogative, I went ahead and merged this PR. On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 1:05 PM, Richard Barnes <r...@ipv.sx> wrote:
> I think this is fine to land now. It's not my favorite approach, but > there's clear consensus. I filed Issue #356 [1] to track the lost > functionality here, and how we might want to add it back. > > https://github.com/ietf-wg-acme/acme/issues/356 > > On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 3:04 PM, Jacob Hoffman-Andrews <j...@eff.org> > wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> Daniel McCarney's been working on PR#342, which changes the new-order >> flow to take a list of identifiers instead of a CSR, and to be finalized >> with a CSR: https://github.com/ietf-wg-acme/acme/pull/342. We've had >> some back-and-forth on the list about this, versus CSR-first, versus >> CSR-first-and-last. There was some further discussion at IETF 100 >> (minutes: >> https://github.com/thomas-fossati/acme-minutes/blob/master/ietf-100.md), >> and we hummed to accept PR 342 over the alternatives. >> >> If there's anyone here who couldn't make it to the meeting and would >> like to raise strenuous objections, please speak up now, otherwise we'll >> incorporate that change. >> >> Thanks, >> Jacob >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Acme mailing list >> Acme@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme >> > >
_______________________________________________ Acme mailing list Acme@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
