would any one care to give a little more insight in to this issue of name
hijacking

i take the point of how in principal an full control over the dns zones and
data is potentially insecure, am i right to say that the risk mainfests
itself only when the computer account of the domain controller is
compromised ??, presumably by getting its password ?

or are there techniques (unknown to me) of "hijacking services" running in
privileged security contexts ?

notwithstanding, it would seem to me a very common "remote site"
configuration for the networking services to be one a single host

GT


----- Original Message -----
From: "Roger Seielstad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 12:35 PM
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] What Services/Server's can be combined with Activ e
Directory.


> You are correct, but realistically a DDNS setup requires DNS and DCs to
> coexist, I'd expect that to be the much more likely scenario.
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
> Sr. Systems Administrator
> Inovis Inc.
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Rick Kingslan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 10:34 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] What Services/Server's can be
> > combined with Active Directory.
> >
> >
> > Missy,
> >
> > Doesn't this only apply when a DNS is also present on the DC?
> >  Combining the DNS and DHCP services can cause a security
> > issue as you noted.  But, if I combine DC services and DNS
> > services, the compromise is not possible.  Also, if I combine
> > DHCP and DC functionality, I'm still secure - true?
> >
> > Good to have you here!
> >
> > Rick Kingslan  MCSE, MCSA, MCT
> > Microsoft MVP - Active Directory
> > Associate Expert
> > Expert Zone - www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/expertzone
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> > Missy Koslosky
> > Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 9:18 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > Glenn,
> >
> > I'd want to keep DHCP off my DC's to avoid name hijacking.
> > See http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;Q255134
> >
> > Hope all is well with you!
> >
> > Missy Koslosky
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Glenn Corbett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Saturday, March 22, 2003 5:33 PM
> > Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] What Services/Server's can be
> > combined with Active Directory.
> >
> >
> > John,
> >
> > The reason why you havent really been able to find a source,
> > is that the answer is "it depends".
> >
> > Depending on the size of your sites, the amount of data,
> > number of clients, other applications using DC services etc,
> > you can really have a single server that does DC, GC, DNS,
> > WINS, DHCP, FP.  I really wouldn't worry about putting DHCP
> > on a server by itself, the load is so small. Out of all of
> > the infrastructure services, DCHP is probably the smallest
> > load.  Client machines get a dhcp address when they start,
> > and IIRC there are two requests during the lifetime of the IP
> > address (one halfway though, and one at the end of the
> > lease).  So for a 2 week lease timeout, you have essentially
> > 3 requests to a DHCP server which is nothing to really worry about.
> >
> > I recently did some AD design work where small sites (up to
> > about 30 uers) had a single server (Dual PIII 2+Ghz) ran all
> > the functions listed previously, plus Exchange with no real
> > trouble.  For larger sites, my suggestion would be one
> > "infrastructure server" (DC, GC, WINS, DHCP, DNS), and
> > "application server(s)" (File Print, Exchange etc).
> >
> > As long as you design your AD site topology correctly (so
> > that replication is optimised, and GC placement is relevant
> > for your clients), AD can pretty much co-exist with most
> > things, its a question of network bandwidth and load on the
> > server.  Other Databases (like Exchange, SQL, Oracle) are
> > really the main applications you need to be careful with when
> > putting on the same server as AD, because they can cramp each
> > others style (Exchange and SQL on the same box for example is
> > very touchy).
> >
> > If you are thinking or layering other applications onto an AD
> > DC, just have a read of the requirements.  In a lot of cases
> > MS "force" you down a particular path. For example, SUS
> > (System Update Services), and MOM (Microsoft Ops Manager)
> > wont run on DC's, so you are forced to put in an additional
> > server to run these.
> >
> > so, as for your original question *grin*, I would have one
> > server that does the "infrastructure" stuff, and another
> > server for FP.
> >
> > Glenn
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "John Strongosky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Saturday, March 22, 2003 11:27 AM
> > Subject: [ActiveDir] What Services/Server's can be combined
> > with Active Directory.
> >
> >
> > > In our planning group we are having a discussion on what
> > > server's/services do we need to combine or can combine for our AD
> > > deployment. I have looked thru allot of Technote's there is not one
> > > definitive answer. Can anyone point me to a source or
> > answer this for me.
> > >
> > > We are thinking of combing: DC,dns and gc's on a server, file and
> > > print
> > and
> > > dhcp on another in our sites or DC, dns, gc on a server, file and
> > > print on
> > a
> > > server and dhcp by itself.
> > >
> > >
> > > john
> > >
> > > List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
> > > List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
> > > List archive:
> > > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
> >
> > List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
> > List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
> > List archive:
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%> 40mail.activedir.org/
> >
> >
> > List info   :
> > http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
> > List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
> > List archive:
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%> 40mail.activedir.org/
> >
> >
> >
> > List info   :
> > http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
> > List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
> > List archive:
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%> 40mail.activedir.org/
> >
> List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
> List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
> List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

Reply via email to