Title: Message
IMHO, ADAM is the more exciting of the two.  Granted MMS is nice in what it does (been working with it on and off for a while) but ADAM is really a special product in what you can do with it.  For those of you that want to integrate your application, but don't want to go to the time expense and trouble of integrating AD or directory sevices (e.g. LDAP) into the app natively, ADAM could be your answer.
 
Other solutions abound - from simple services to security uses.
 

Rick Kingslan  MCSE, MCSA, MCT
Microsoft MVP - Active Directory
Associate Expert
Expert Zone - www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/expertzone
 



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Myrick, Todd (NIH/CIT)
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 7:24 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ActiveDir] MMS 2003 and ADAM 2003

I just got word that MMS 2003 and ADAM 2003 are shipping the week of July 3rd.
 
Now to afford the server requirements to run MMS 2003.
 
Requirements for MMS 2003
 
Windows 2003 EE
SQL 2000 EE
Visual Studio .NET 2003
Hardware
 
Makes Simple Sync look very attractive, but the MMS requirements do offer some tangible benefits.
 
Todd
 
 
 

Reply via email to