|
IMHO, ADAM is the more exciting of the two. Granted
MMS is nice in what it does (been working with it on and off for a while) but
ADAM is really a special product in what you can do with it. For those of
you that want to integrate your application, but don't want to go to the time
expense and trouble of integrating AD or directory sevices (e.g. LDAP) into the
app natively, ADAM could be your answer.
Other solutions abound - from simple services to
security uses.
Rick Kingslan MCSE, MCSA, MCT From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Myrick, Todd (NIH/CIT) Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 7:24 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [ActiveDir] MMS 2003 and ADAM 2003 I just got word that
MMS 2003 and ADAM 2003 are shipping the week of July 3rd.
Now to afford the
server requirements to run MMS 2003.
Requirements for MMS
2003
Windows 2003
EE
SQL 2000
EE
Visual Studio .NET
2003
Hardware
Makes Simple Sync
look very attractive, but the MMS requirements do offer some tangible
benefits.
Todd
|
Title: Message
- [ActiveDir] MMS 2003 and ADAM 2003 Myrick, Todd (NIH/CIT)
- Re: [ActiveDir] MMS 2003 and ADAM 2003 Rick Kingslan
- Re: [ActiveDir] MMS 2003 and ADAM 2003 Glenn Corbett
- RE: [ActiveDir] MMS 2003 and ADAM 2003 Rick Kingslan
- Re: [ActiveDir] MMS 2003 and ADAM ... Glenn Corbett
- RE: [ActiveDir] MMS 2003 and ... Rick Kingslan
- Re: [ActiveDir] MMS 2003 ... Glenn Corbett
- RE: [ActiveDir] MMS 2... Joe
- Re: [ActiveDir] MMS 2... Glenn Corbett
- RE: [ActiveDir] MMS 2003 and ADAM 2003 Duncan, Larry
- RE: [ActiveDir] MMS 2003 and ADAM 2003 Myrick, Todd (NIH/CIT)
- RE: [ActiveDir] MMS 2003 and ADAM 2003 Myrick, Todd (NIH/CIT)
