|
I would encourage organizations to consider a registry for Adam's or LDAP type directories. You don't want to end up with the same mess NT 4 domains created for applications. I would find out if the application does authentication via the directory, and if it does, encourage the developers to use an infrastructure Single Sign On product.
Just my humble opinion.
Todd
-----Original Message-----
ADAM is also good for those applications that want to start doing some AD integration functionality without actually having to set up an AD forest.
Makes us Infrastructure guys nice and happy, don't have to keep setting up and pulling down AD forests every week or so for the apps dev guys :)
Glenn
|
Title: Message
- RE: [ActiveDir] MMS 2003 and ADAM 2003 Rick Kingslan
- Re: [ActiveDir] MMS 2003 and ADAM 2003 Glenn Corbett
- RE: [ActiveDir] MMS 2003 and ADAM 2003 Rick Kingslan
- Re: [ActiveDir] MMS 2003 and ADAM 2003 Glenn Corbett
- RE: [ActiveDir] MMS 2003 and ADAM ... Rick Kingslan
- Re: [ActiveDir] MMS 2003 and ... Glenn Corbett
- RE: [ActiveDir] MMS 2003 ... Joe
- Re: [ActiveDir] MMS 2003 ... Glenn Corbett
- RE: [ActiveDir] MMS 2003 and ADAM 2003 Duncan, Larry
- RE: [ActiveDir] MMS 2003 and ADAM 2003 Myrick, Todd (NIH/CIT)
- Re: [ActiveDir] MMS 2003 and ADAM 2003 Myrick, Todd (NIH/CIT)
- Re: [ActiveDir] MMS 2003 and ADAM 2003 Glenn Corbett
- RE: [ActiveDir] MMS 2003 and ADAM 2003 Joe
- Re: [ActiveDir] MMS 2003 and ADAM 2003 Glenn Corbett
- RE: [ActiveDir] MMS 2003 and ADAM ... Joe
- Re: [ActiveDir] MMS 2003 and ... Glenn Corbett
- RE: [ActiveDir] MMS 2003 and ADAM 2003 Myrick, Todd (NIH/CIT)
- RE: [ActiveDir] MMS 2003 and ADAM 2003 Myrick, Todd (NIH/CIT)
