It uses SUS-type functionality, but the code-bases are completely different.
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roger Seielstad Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 8:24 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] SUS does SPs now Two separate products entirely - but there is an SUS feature pack for SMS, which I believe uses the SUS server to automatically build packages for separate SMS deployment. -------------------------------------------------------------- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. > -----Original Message----- > From: Graham Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 4:44 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] SUS does SPs now > > > Have just picked up on this thread of SUS - looks a real winner > > would be glad for the views of the positioning of this product > relative to SMS ?? > > GT > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Free, Bob" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 11:44 PM > Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] SUS does SPs now > > > >a complete rollup with every patch released for a particular OS. > > There is actually a current WU beta along those lines... > > If history repeats, it may be available sooner than later > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Crenshaw, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 1:17 PM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] SUS does SPs now > > > You should see a "roll-back/recall" in SUS 2.0. I didn't hear about > the SP's being available in SUS until this morning when I saw that it > was something that was available to be published, so something or > someone must have pulled the trigger for this to happen. Being an > Enterprise customer of Microsoft, they usually go way out of their way > to ensure that we know about major upcoming changes before going live > with them. > > I guess Microsoft is tired of getting slammed with deployment problems > for SP's. For anyone not using SMS, UpdateExpert, or something else > along those lines, deploying SP's enterprise wide can be a task within > itself. > > It's too bad that Microsoft doesn't offer patches in a two prong > manner. > One being you can just install the one "hotfix" for a particular > problem and the other would be a complete rollup with every patch > released for a particular OS. > > Of course, it is easy to say that from a customer side. I don't have > to write or manage any of the changes; I just have to work with what I > am given. > > Jason > > > > > List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm > List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm > List archive: > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%> 40mail.activedir.org/ > > > List info : > http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm > List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm > List archive: > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%> 40mail.activedir.org/ > List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
