We got SBS 2003 6 months after Windows 2003.
We don't even have Vista yet folks... how relatively short is short to
you guys?
Vista is possibly Christmas 2006 yes? Server after that...remember we're
just now getting R2 in late 2005, we'll hit Longhorn in 2007.... SBS
after that.
I find this thread kinda funny... Security folks have argued for MS to
drop backwards compatibility... Mac's did after all....to get better
security. So here they are dropping backwards compatibility for the
benefits of 64 bit, right? And look at us.... it's business side
talking again, isn't it?
More small firms are leasing or buying over time. More small firms are
looking into hosted solutions...we're tired of the patch it and break it.
2003 is solid..unlike NT and yet look at the NT still deployed.. And
when that compelling story of why a business should upgrade occurs
because of the productivity gains... I'll bet that will push folks.
Hopefully then we can finally rip out all the lanman stuff...ya think?
Do they need to get the migration documentation, guidance ready to
go...yeah ...that they need to do.
Tomasz Onyszko wrote:
joe wrote:
I don't believe Exchange 12 is waiting for Longhorn.
Also SBS Longhorn is in the scope due to Exchange 12.
Yes, You are right - I just replied to Your post where you mentioned
specific about longhorn. I don't feel very well with this announcement
too. I'm not sure if it is good step especially with exchange 12 which
will be released in relatively short time.
--
Letting your vendors set your risk analysis these days?
http://www.threatcode.com
List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
