Will embedded and nested scaffolds still work without defining a route resource for each scaffold?
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 12:30 AM, Sergio Cambra .:: entreCables S.L. ::. < [email protected]> wrote: > On Martes, 9 de Febrero de 2010 19:22:18 kintner escribió: > > On Feb 4, 11:09 am, "Sergio Cambra .:: entreCables S.L. ::." > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Jueves, 4 de Febrero de 2010 15:33:59 Kenneth Ortmann escribió: > > > > I'm sure a branch will be created shortly. Sergio may have more > > > > information > > > > > > My personal roadmap is: > > > - fix some bugs and easy issues from google code > > > - look at edwin moss changes and merge some of them. > > > - create a new branch to merge incompatible changes (branches security > > > and experimental) to get rid of render_component (only will be used to > > > activescaffold embedded) > > > > So will you be dropping support for embedded activescaffold? Or will > > there be another way to do it without using components? > > No, embedded scaffolds will continue working with render_component, but > render_component won't be needed for nested scaffolds. Also session won't > be > used for constraints, so some strange errors with session cookie > overflowing > will be fixed. Nested routes will be used for nested scaffolds if you setup > them, in other way parameters will be sent in query string (?parent_id=3). > It's on experimental branch, although it needs more testing. > > > > > > - cleanup some code using new features of rails (such as > > > accepts_nested_attributes_for, using mass assignment) > > > - support for rails 3 > > > > > > Support for rails 3 could get more priority if I start to use rails 3 > > > before I finish the other changes, but I'm not using it ATM neither > > > planning to use it in a near future. I'm not against other work in > rails > > > 3 support. > > > > > > > ~Kenny > > > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 8:22 AM, Tom Cocca <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > Hi Guys, I couldn't find any information on this and I am just > > > > > curious about it, no immediate requests because rails 3.0.0beta > just > > > > > came out last night. > > > > > > > > > > I was wondering what that plan/roadmap was for AS and Rails 3? Is > > > > > there a branch going somewhere or has dev not started on this yet? > > > > > > > > > > Just curious. > > > > > > > > > > Great work as always, > > > > > ~ Tom > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > > > > Groups "ActiveScaffold : Ruby on Rails plugin" group. > > > > > To post to this group, send email to > [email protected]. > > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > > > [email protected]<activescaffold%[email protected]> > <activescaffold%2Bunsubscr > > > > >ibe@ googlegroups.com> . > > > > > For more options, visit this group at > > > > >http://groups.google.com/group/activescaffold?hl=en. > > > > > > -- > > > Sergio Cambra .:: entreCables S.L. ::. > > > Mariana Pineda 23, 50.018 Zaragoza > > > T) 902 021 404 F) 976 52 98 07 E) [email protected] > > -- > Sergio Cambra .:: entreCables S.L. ::. > Mariana Pineda 23, 50.018 Zaragoza > T) 902 021 404 F) 976 52 98 07 E) [email protected] > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "ActiveScaffold : Ruby on Rails plugin" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<activescaffold%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/activescaffold?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ActiveScaffold : Ruby on Rails plugin" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/activescaffold?hl=en.
