I could be wrong but I think they addressed the routes overhead issue some in 
rails 3
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry

-----Original Message-----
From: Nick Rogers <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:14:16 
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: ActiveScaffold Rails 3 Roadmap?

I realize that but currently the memory footprint of each route resource you
define is huge. I use about 150 active scaffolds in my application and
defining a resource for each just makes the memory utilization of my
application far too large (basically double per webserver process).

On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 8:15 AM, Kenneth Ortmann <[email protected]>wrote:

> If you are using embeded and nested scaffolds without defining a route for
> the controllers I would stop doing this.  This is a bad practice.
> Nick did you remove the default routes from your routes.rb file?  Defining
> the resources in your routes file to be part of active_scaffold isn't
> something that was just thrown in as a nice to have.  Every action for every
> controller should be specified in your routes file and the default routes
> should be removed.  You can leave your website open to huge vulnerabilities
> if you don't remove the default routes...
>
> ~Kenny
>
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 9:39 AM, Nick Rogers <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Will embedded and nested scaffolds still work without defining a route
>> resource for each scaffold?
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 12:30 AM, Sergio Cambra .:: entreCables S.L. ::.
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> On Martes, 9 de Febrero de 2010 19:22:18 kintner escribió:
>>> > On Feb 4, 11:09 am, "Sergio Cambra .:: entreCables S.L. ::."
>>> >
>>> > <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> > > On Jueves, 4 de Febrero de 2010 15:33:59 Kenneth Ortmann escribió:
>>> > > > I'm sure a branch will be created shortly.  Sergio may have more
>>> > > > information
>>> > >
>>> > > My personal roadmap is:
>>> > > - fix some bugs and easy issues from google code
>>> > > - look at edwin moss changes and merge some of them.
>>> > > - create a new branch to merge incompatible changes (branches
>>> security
>>> > > and experimental) to get rid of render_component (only will be used
>>> to
>>> > > activescaffold embedded)
>>> >
>>> > So will you be dropping support for embedded activescaffold? Or will
>>> > there be another way to do it without using components?
>>>
>>> No, embedded scaffolds will continue working with render_component, but
>>> render_component won't be needed for nested scaffolds. Also session won't
>>> be
>>> used for constraints, so some strange errors with session cookie
>>> overflowing
>>> will be fixed. Nested routes will be used for nested scaffolds if you
>>> setup
>>> them, in other way parameters will be sent in query string
>>> (?parent_id=3).
>>> It's on experimental branch, although it needs more testing.
>>>
>>> >
>>> > > - cleanup some code using new features of rails (such as
>>> > > accepts_nested_attributes_for, using mass assignment)
>>> > > - support for rails 3
>>> > >
>>> > > Support for rails 3 could get more priority if I start to use rails 3
>>> > > before I finish the other changes, but I'm not using it ATM neither
>>> > > planning to use it in a near future. I'm not against other work in
>>> rails
>>> > > 3 support.
>>> > >
>>> > > > ~Kenny
>>> > > >
>>> > > > On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 8:22 AM, Tom Cocca <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>> > > > > Hi Guys, I couldn't find any information on this and I am just
>>> > > > > curious about it, no immediate requests because rails 3.0.0beta
>>> just
>>> > > > > came out last night.
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > I was wondering what that plan/roadmap was for AS and Rails 3?
>>>  Is
>>> > > > > there a branch going somewhere or has dev not started on this
>>> yet?
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > Just curious.
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > Great work as always,
>>> > > > > ~ Tom
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > --
>>> > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the
>>> Google
>>> > > > > Groups "ActiveScaffold : Ruby on Rails plugin" group.
>>> > > > > To post to this group, send email to
>>> [email protected].
>>> > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> > > > > [email protected]<activescaffold%[email protected]>
>>> <activescaffold%2Bunsubscr
>>> > > > >ibe@ googlegroups.com> .
>>> > > > > For more options, visit this group at
>>> > > > >http://groups.google.com/group/activescaffold?hl=en.
>>> > >
>>> > > --
>>> > > Sergio Cambra .:: entreCables S.L. ::.
>>> > > Mariana Pineda 23, 50.018 Zaragoza
>>> > > T) 902 021 404 F) 976 52 98 07 E) [email protected]
>>>
>>> --
>>> Sergio Cambra .:: entreCables S.L. ::.
>>> Mariana Pineda 23, 50.018 Zaragoza
>>> T) 902 021 404 F) 976 52 98 07 E) [email protected]
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>>> "ActiveScaffold : Ruby on Rails plugin" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> [email protected]<activescaffold%[email protected]>
>>> .
>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/activescaffold?hl=en.
>>>
>>>
>>  --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "ActiveScaffold : Ruby on Rails plugin" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> [email protected]<activescaffold%[email protected]>
>> .
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/activescaffold?hl=en.
>>
>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "ActiveScaffold : Ruby on Rails plugin" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<activescaffold%[email protected]>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/activescaffold?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"ActiveScaffold : Ruby on Rails plugin" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/activescaffold?hl=en.


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"ActiveScaffold : Ruby on Rails plugin" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/activescaffold?hl=en.

Reply via email to