If you are using embeded and nested scaffolds without defining a route for the controllers I would stop doing this. This is a bad practice. Nick did you remove the default routes from your routes.rb file? Defining the resources in your routes file to be part of active_scaffold isn't something that was just thrown in as a nice to have. Every action for every controller should be specified in your routes file and the default routes should be removed. You can leave your website open to huge vulnerabilities if you don't remove the default routes...
~Kenny On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 9:39 AM, Nick Rogers <[email protected]> wrote: > Will embedded and nested scaffolds still work without defining a route > resource for each scaffold? > > > On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 12:30 AM, Sergio Cambra .:: entreCables S.L. ::. < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> On Martes, 9 de Febrero de 2010 19:22:18 kintner escribió: >> > On Feb 4, 11:09 am, "Sergio Cambra .:: entreCables S.L. ::." >> > >> > <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > On Jueves, 4 de Febrero de 2010 15:33:59 Kenneth Ortmann escribió: >> > > > I'm sure a branch will be created shortly. Sergio may have more >> > > > information >> > > >> > > My personal roadmap is: >> > > - fix some bugs and easy issues from google code >> > > - look at edwin moss changes and merge some of them. >> > > - create a new branch to merge incompatible changes (branches security >> > > and experimental) to get rid of render_component (only will be used to >> > > activescaffold embedded) >> > >> > So will you be dropping support for embedded activescaffold? Or will >> > there be another way to do it without using components? >> >> No, embedded scaffolds will continue working with render_component, but >> render_component won't be needed for nested scaffolds. Also session won't >> be >> used for constraints, so some strange errors with session cookie >> overflowing >> will be fixed. Nested routes will be used for nested scaffolds if you >> setup >> them, in other way parameters will be sent in query string (?parent_id=3). >> It's on experimental branch, although it needs more testing. >> >> > >> > > - cleanup some code using new features of rails (such as >> > > accepts_nested_attributes_for, using mass assignment) >> > > - support for rails 3 >> > > >> > > Support for rails 3 could get more priority if I start to use rails 3 >> > > before I finish the other changes, but I'm not using it ATM neither >> > > planning to use it in a near future. I'm not against other work in >> rails >> > > 3 support. >> > > >> > > > ~Kenny >> > > > >> > > > On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 8:22 AM, Tom Cocca <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > > > > Hi Guys, I couldn't find any information on this and I am just >> > > > > curious about it, no immediate requests because rails 3.0.0beta >> just >> > > > > came out last night. >> > > > > >> > > > > I was wondering what that plan/roadmap was for AS and Rails 3? Is >> > > > > there a branch going somewhere or has dev not started on this yet? >> > > > > >> > > > > Just curious. >> > > > > >> > > > > Great work as always, >> > > > > ~ Tom >> > > > > >> > > > > -- >> > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> > > > > Groups "ActiveScaffold : Ruby on Rails plugin" group. >> > > > > To post to this group, send email to >> [email protected]. >> > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> > > > > [email protected]<activescaffold%[email protected]> >> <activescaffold%2Bunsubscr >> > > > >ibe@ googlegroups.com> . >> > > > > For more options, visit this group at >> > > > >http://groups.google.com/group/activescaffold?hl=en. >> > > >> > > -- >> > > Sergio Cambra .:: entreCables S.L. ::. >> > > Mariana Pineda 23, 50.018 Zaragoza >> > > T) 902 021 404 F) 976 52 98 07 E) [email protected] >> >> -- >> Sergio Cambra .:: entreCables S.L. ::. >> Mariana Pineda 23, 50.018 Zaragoza >> T) 902 021 404 F) 976 52 98 07 E) [email protected] >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "ActiveScaffold : Ruby on Rails plugin" group. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]<activescaffold%[email protected]> >> . >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/activescaffold?hl=en. >> >> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "ActiveScaffold : Ruby on Rails plugin" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<activescaffold%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/activescaffold?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ActiveScaffold : Ruby on Rails plugin" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/activescaffold?hl=en.
