Yeah thats what I was hoping, though I have not looked into it yet. Thanks for the input.
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 5:13 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > I could be wrong but I think they addressed the routes overhead issue some > in rails 3 > > Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry > ------------------------------ > *From: * Nick Rogers <[email protected]> > *Date: *Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:14:16 -0800 > *To: *<[email protected]> > *Subject: *Re: ActiveScaffold Rails 3 Roadmap? > > I realize that but currently the memory footprint of each route resource > you define is huge. I use about 150 active scaffolds in my application and > defining a resource for each just makes the memory utilization of my > application far too large (basically double per webserver process). > > On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 8:15 AM, Kenneth Ortmann > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> If you are using embeded and nested scaffolds without defining a route for >> the controllers I would stop doing this. This is a bad practice. >> Nick did you remove the default routes from your routes.rb file? Defining >> the resources in your routes file to be part of active_scaffold isn't >> something that was just thrown in as a nice to have. Every action for every >> controller should be specified in your routes file and the default routes >> should be removed. You can leave your website open to huge vulnerabilities >> if you don't remove the default routes... >> >> ~Kenny >> >> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 9:39 AM, Nick Rogers <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Will embedded and nested scaffolds still work without defining a route >>> resource for each scaffold? >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 12:30 AM, Sergio Cambra .:: entreCables S.L. ::. >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> On Martes, 9 de Febrero de 2010 19:22:18 kintner escribió: >>>> > On Feb 4, 11:09 am, "Sergio Cambra .:: entreCables S.L. ::." >>>> > >>>> > <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> > > On Jueves, 4 de Febrero de 2010 15:33:59 Kenneth Ortmann escribió: >>>> > > > I'm sure a branch will be created shortly. Sergio may have more >>>> > > > information >>>> > > >>>> > > My personal roadmap is: >>>> > > - fix some bugs and easy issues from google code >>>> > > - look at edwin moss changes and merge some of them. >>>> > > - create a new branch to merge incompatible changes (branches >>>> security >>>> > > and experimental) to get rid of render_component (only will be used >>>> to >>>> > > activescaffold embedded) >>>> > >>>> > So will you be dropping support for embedded activescaffold? Or will >>>> > there be another way to do it without using components? >>>> >>>> No, embedded scaffolds will continue working with render_component, but >>>> render_component won't be needed for nested scaffolds. Also session >>>> won't be >>>> used for constraints, so some strange errors with session cookie >>>> overflowing >>>> will be fixed. Nested routes will be used for nested scaffolds if you >>>> setup >>>> them, in other way parameters will be sent in query string >>>> (?parent_id=3). >>>> It's on experimental branch, although it needs more testing. >>>> >>>> > >>>> > > - cleanup some code using new features of rails (such as >>>> > > accepts_nested_attributes_for, using mass assignment) >>>> > > - support for rails 3 >>>> > > >>>> > > Support for rails 3 could get more priority if I start to use rails >>>> 3 >>>> > > before I finish the other changes, but I'm not using it ATM neither >>>> > > planning to use it in a near future. I'm not against other work in >>>> rails >>>> > > 3 support. >>>> > > >>>> > > > ~Kenny >>>> > > > >>>> > > > On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 8:22 AM, Tom Cocca <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> > > > > Hi Guys, I couldn't find any information on this and I am just >>>> > > > > curious about it, no immediate requests because rails 3.0.0beta >>>> just >>>> > > > > came out last night. >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > I was wondering what that plan/roadmap was for AS and Rails 3? >>>> Is >>>> > > > > there a branch going somewhere or has dev not started on this >>>> yet? >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > Just curious. >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > Great work as always, >>>> > > > > ~ Tom >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > -- >>>> > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the >>>> Google >>>> > > > > Groups "ActiveScaffold : Ruby on Rails plugin" group. >>>> > > > > To post to this group, send email to >>>> [email protected]. >>>> > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>> > > > > [email protected]<activescaffold%[email protected]> >>>> <activescaffold%2Bunsubscr >>>> > > > >ibe@ googlegroups.com> . >>>> > > > > For more options, visit this group at >>>> > > > >http://groups.google.com/group/activescaffold?hl=en. >>>> > > >>>> > > -- >>>> > > Sergio Cambra .:: entreCables S.L. ::. >>>> > > Mariana Pineda 23, 50.018 Zaragoza >>>> > > T) 902 021 404 F) 976 52 98 07 E) [email protected] >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Sergio Cambra .:: entreCables S.L. ::. >>>> Mariana Pineda 23, 50.018 Zaragoza >>>> T) 902 021 404 F) 976 52 98 07 E) [email protected] >>>> >>>> -- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups "ActiveScaffold : Ruby on Rails plugin" group. >>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>> [email protected]<activescaffold%[email protected]> >>>> . >>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>> http://groups.google.com/group/activescaffold?hl=en. >>>> >>>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>> "ActiveScaffold : Ruby on Rails plugin" group. >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> [email protected]<activescaffold%[email protected]> >>> . >>> For more options, visit this group at >>> http://groups.google.com/group/activescaffold?hl=en. >>> >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "ActiveScaffold : Ruby on Rails plugin" group. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]<activescaffold%[email protected]> >> . >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/activescaffold?hl=en. >> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "ActiveScaffold : Ruby on Rails plugin" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<activescaffold%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/activescaffold?hl=en. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "ActiveScaffold : Ruby on Rails plugin" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<activescaffold%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/activescaffold?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ActiveScaffold : Ruby on Rails plugin" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/activescaffold?hl=en.
