Cool - that is what I was going to start working on. :) Please let us know when your 2.1 fixes to ETL are checked in - I'd like to try it out with our ETL (and I have a bunch of test cases for it).
Thanks! Darin > From: Anthony Eden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 06:59:41 -0400 > To: Marty Haught <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: <activewarehouse-discuss@rubyforge.org> > Subject: Re: [Activewarehouse-discuss] would the real codebase please stand > up? :) > > I've started the upgrade to 2.1. I've already modified ActiveWarehouse > ETL to handle the new migration process and I have it running right > now under 2.1. Once I get past my first ETL load on the project I'm > working on I'll move onto the AW plugin. > > -Anthony > _______________________________________________ > Activewarehouse-discuss mailing list > Activewarehouse-discuss@rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/activewarehouse-discuss _______________________________________________ Activewarehouse-discuss mailing list Activewarehouse-discuss@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/activewarehouse-discuss
