I think I have most of the fixes to ETL in for the 2.1 changes. I've started changing over some of the tests to use shoulda 1.x, so if you want to run the built in tests then you'll need the shoulda gem. There are currently two failing tests related to the SCD implementation. Jacob, was that an area you worked on? If so could you take a look at the failing tests? Also, I currently have tested with Postgres locally but not MySQL, so if someone wants to fight through the test suite on MySQL, be my guest. :-)
Thanks. -Anthony On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 12:11 PM, Darin Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Cool - that is what I was going to start working on. :) > > Please let us know when your 2.1 fixes to ETL are checked in - I'd like to > try it out with our ETL (and I have a bunch of test cases for it). > > Thanks! > Darin > >> From: Anthony Eden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 06:59:41 -0400 >> To: Marty Haught <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Cc: <activewarehouse-discuss@rubyforge.org> >> Subject: Re: [Activewarehouse-discuss] would the real codebase please stand >> up? :) >> >> I've started the upgrade to 2.1. I've already modified ActiveWarehouse >> ETL to handle the new migration process and I have it running right >> now under 2.1. Once I get past my first ETL load on the project I'm >> working on I'll move onto the AW plugin. >> >> -Anthony >> _______________________________________________ >> Activewarehouse-discuss mailing list >> Activewarehouse-discuss@rubyforge.org >> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/activewarehouse-discuss > > > _______________________________________________ > Activewarehouse-discuss mailing list > Activewarehouse-discuss@rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/activewarehouse-discuss > _______________________________________________ Activewarehouse-discuss mailing list Activewarehouse-discuss@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/activewarehouse-discuss
