Anthony - tests are passing for me with Postgres.  I think the issue is that I 
made some changes to adapter_extensions.  I just sent you a pull request for 
adapter_extensions so let me know if that fixes tests.  I also sent a pull 
request for the activewarehouse code we've been using in production.  It only 
contains a few commits from the point that you last pulled from my branch, but 
it would be best to be on the same page.  I still have your pull request 
outstanding - I hope to get to that this weekend.  If that exposes test 
failures, I'll let you know.

Best,
Jacob

----- Anthony Eden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think I have most of the fixes to ETL in for the 2.1 changes. I've
> started changing over some of the tests to use shoulda 1.x, so if you
> want to run the built in tests then you'll need the shoulda gem. There
> are currently two failing tests related to the SCD implementation.
> Jacob, was that an area you worked on? If so could you take a look at
> the failing tests? Also, I currently have tested with Postgres locally
> but not MySQL, so if someone wants to fight through the test suite on
> MySQL, be my guest. :-)
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> -Anthony
> 
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 12:11 PM, Darin Wilson
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Cool - that is what I was going to start working on. :)
> >
> > Please let us know when your 2.1 fixes to ETL are checked in - I'd like to
> > try it out with our ETL (and I have a bunch of test cases for it).
> >
> > Thanks!
> > Darin
> >
> >> From: Anthony Eden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 06:59:41 -0400
> >> To: Marty Haught <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> Cc: <[email protected]>
> >> Subject: Re: [Activewarehouse-discuss] would the real codebase please stand
> >> up? :)
> >>
> >> I've started the upgrade to 2.1. I've already modified ActiveWarehouse
> >> ETL to handle the new migration process and I have it running right
> >> now under 2.1. Once I get past my first ETL load on the project I'm
> >> working on I'll move onto the AW plugin.
> >>
> >> -Anthony
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Activewarehouse-discuss mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/activewarehouse-discuss
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Activewarehouse-discuss mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/activewarehouse-discuss
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Activewarehouse-discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/activewarehouse-discuss

_______________________________________________
Activewarehouse-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/activewarehouse-discuss

Reply via email to