Hi, On Sat, May 19, 2018 at 02:09:03PM +0100, Sascha Luck [ml] wrote: > It's not a formal requirement but, de-facto, if the holder of PA > resources wants connectivity, they have to get it from the LIR. > Otherwise, why would there be a necessity for > "provider-aggregateable" resources?
That is the "traditional" ISP=LIR model.
Especially in the government and enterprise market, there's other models
today, like "the government LIR holds a /26, each region in a country
has a /32 out of that, and each region is free to pick their own ISP
to have the /32 routed".
(The impact to the routing table is is about the same as "each region
has their own LIR", but for internal administrative reasons these setups
prefer to have a common address space for all official networks...)
Gert Doering
-- APWG chair
--
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
