Hi, On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 05:29:32PM +0100, Sascha Luck [ml] wrote: > rather than making policy successively more dense, technically > prescriptive and complicated, is it not way past time to abolish > the PA/PI distinction altogether? > In other words, decouple the "LIR" function from the "ISP" > function.
Well, that seems to be what Jordi's idea seems to be about - but it
is neither easy nor straightforward how to get there. We've tried
a few years ago, and when you mix in "fees", "membership / voting rights"
and "allocation size", things get amazingly complicated...
(And if you are *not* looking at these aspects, removing the PA/PI
label isn't actually achieving much, except replacing it by a "block
for member" vs. "block for non-member" label, no?)
Gert Doering
-- APWG chair
--
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
