My first reaction is that this is total non-sense. But is it? Lee
--- In [email protected], [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Sounds like the EU to me.... > > On Sun, 1 Jan 2006, Road Runner wrote: > > > A friend of mine who has been in the videography business for the last 17 years > > told me that large cities such as San Francisco, San Diego, and the such have > > copyrighted the image of their city skyline. > > > > He used to live in San Diego, and he said that you cannot video tape the skyline of > > San Diego and put it in one of your productions unless you pay the City of San Diego > > a copy right fee which I think he said was about $30. > > > > Has anyone else ever heard of such an extreme copyright rule? Does that mean you have to > > pay New York City a fee to use a video clip of their skyline which would include the > > Statue of Liberty and the other tall buildings. If this is true, pretty soon some one is going > > to copyright the air we breathe and demand a "use" fee for breathing it. > > > > John > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Adobe-Premiere/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
