Sorry, I misread your question. I believe it would be the same as CBR, since you are eliminating the variables and recording at a constant bit rate. I don't recommend CBR because the quality and playback will suffer. Friends don't let friends encode in CBR...
Jeff White Taky Cheung wrote: > > > I know 2-pass VBR better than 1-pass. I'm just wondering if I set the > min/avg/max all the same bit rate in 2-pass VBR. Would that be same as > 1-pass CBR. > > From: J White > Sent: Friday, February 22, 2008 3:55 AM > To: [email protected] > <mailto:Adobe-Premiere%40yahoogroups.com> > Subject: Re: [AP] 1-pass vs 2-pass encoding > > No, 2 pass encoding is always better. The first pass is examining the > footage to determine the places that the encoder may need to allocate > extra bits (like fast motion or high detailed scenes) and where it can > use less bits (like still photos, graphics or black scenes). Then that > information is used in the second pass, the actual encoding pass, to > create a higher quality encode. > > For DVD masters, I always use 2 pass VBR. There is a definite difference > between 1 pass VBR or even CBR. > > Jeff White > > Taky Cheung wrote: > > > > > > if I'm encoding MPEG-2 DVD setting all minimum, average, and maximum bit > > rate to the same value, is it necessary to encode in 2-pass? Will 1-pass > > give the same result with such bit rate settings? > Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Adobe-Premiere/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Adobe-Premiere/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
