Yes, they would show up in a q libvol. Look in the actlog for a failed
label libvol command.
If you try to read or write an unlabeled tape, it will give an I/O error and
a sense code possibly (00.00.00.77)
ADSM support can determine what the sense code data means. 77 apparently
means the volume was unlabeled.
Try auditing a volume. Also try to determine if the internal label matches
the barcode. Our IBM CE uses show mainframe tool to accomplish this.
Jeff Bach
-----Original Message-----
From: Marc Levitan [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 12:17 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Library Audit Unsuccessful
Yeah but would they show up in q libv if they were not labeled?
It is not a shared library...
Thanks,
Marc
Richard Sims
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: cc:
"ADSM: Dist Subject: Re: Library
Audit Unsuccessful
Stor Manager"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RIST.EDU>
07/10/2001
01:02 PM
Please
respond to
"ADSM: Dist
Stor Manager"
>If i run a "audit library tekwolf checklabel=barcode" it completes
>successfully. It's when the audit actually mounts the volumes to
check
the
>labels that it fails.
>
>any ideas?
Marc - If you're lucky, those are new volumes that were inserted
without
having been labeled. Otherwise they may be old volumes
which,
in the classic shared library scenario, were overwritten by the ogre
you're sharing the library with.
Richard Sims, BU
**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential
and intended solely for the individual or entity to
whom they are addressed. If you have received this email
in error destroy it immediately.
**********************************************************************
