Thats true. But I would like to count all the years that I was shamefully ignorant and unrealized like some people on this forum still are . example - jpEnlightenmentguy
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 12:54 PM, Mark Ty-Wharton <[email protected]>wrote: > Realisation takes no time... > > Not being self realised took you 28 years and maybe a year of that doing > kundalini and not being realised. > > Realisation itself took no time - it simply happened istantaneously. > > Sent from an iPhone > > On 19 Jun 2010, at 11:09, roomsearching <[email protected]> wrote: > > Welcome jPEnlightenment. > Have you ever had kundalini ? > I have it. Do you know what it means ? It means lifelong nutty behaviour. > Your bed will shake at night. You will become a recluse. People will think > you are mental and you would even believe them. :) > > Have you experienced Self-realization ? > I have and it takes a minimum of 1 year to get it (excluding my overall > life-experience and maturity of 28 years at the time and maybe genetics and > previous birth karma which I dont believe). > > Do you think I am a spiritual person or a Sufi Dervish ? > Well, before I started this, I was only interested in fucking chicks and I > did spend a lot of time trying to pick up girls. > > Do you think I do mental-masturbation ? > I masturbate physically at least once a day because kundalini/Self > realization for some reason improves health and increases sperm production. > The mind is perfectly still, blissful and it does not tolerate mental > activity. > > Who are you ? > You are a ridiculous and pathetic person. Or you must be an > over-enthusiastic Indian guy which some people call as noob. > Are you ? > > > > > > On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 10:01 AM, Anandanand < <[email protected]> > [email protected]> wrote: > >> And welcome jpE >> >> On Jun 19, 1:42 pm, Anandanand <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Rediculous discussion boards? What makes you say that? is it due to >> > the answers/ responses/ replys you got or you thought so even before >> > asking the question ? Or is there another reason ? >> > >> > On Jun 19, 1:13 am, jp EnlightenmentGuy <[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> > >> > > This always happens: >> > >> > > I ask an extremely succinct, easy-to-understand, fundamental question >> > > and I get one of two responses: >> > >> > > 1. So called "regular" people look at me like I am dumb as a bag of >> > > rocks for even asking such a silly question about something so >> > > obvious. "Nobody thinks about this stuff, what is wrong with you? You >> > > need to get out and get LAID already!!!" >> > >> > > 2. So called "spiritual" people respond with things that are really >> > > clear like "Sufi dervishes go Hoo Hooo Hoooo". Or equally as helpful, >> > > "So, WHO is asking the question? WHO is it that is confused? >> > > Whoooo..... Whooooooooo......." which they repeat a zillion times, >> > > like I haven't heard that a zillion times before. >> > >> > > Will I ever learn? The more I seek answers from others, the more I >> > > find I am on my own. >> > >> > > Those that aren't "on the path" likely never will be -- trying to ask >> > > them about it, or worse -- trying to get them to join in on it -- >> > > leads to inevitable frustration. There is nothing for me there. There >> > > is nothing for me, with 99.9999++% of humanity. >> > >> > > And I suspect almost all people who SEEM to be "on the path", those >> > > who show up at retreats and Satsangs, or worse -- ridiculous >> > > discussion boards like this -- are just tourists, interested in "this >> > > stuff", or think its cool, another fun mental-masturbation exercise, >> > > or this is just another cool spiritual thing they are incorporating >> > > into their plethora of other neato spiritual thingeys they are >> > > sampling. Sure seems that way. Seems to be nothing for me here, >> > > either. >> > >> > > On my own. >> > >> > > Hopefully, finally, DAMMIT, hopefully totally on my own............... >> > >> > > On Jun 17, 1:26 pm, jp EnlightenmentGuy <[email protected] >> > >> > > wrote: >> > >> > > > I have heard many spiritual teachers just dismissively say things >> > > > like, >> > >> > > > "You can't be anything that changes, right? You are not the body, or >> > > > mind, or memories, or personality or whatever." >> > >> > > > Really? >> > >> > > > I'll bet 99.99%++ of all humans who have ever existed would agree >> with >> > > > what is written below. Can you say, clearly, why this is not >> > > > accurate?? >> > >> > > > . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . >> > >> > > > Who or what am I? I am a body, with certain attributes and >> abilities >> > > > (physical and mental), born to parents, exposed to things in the >> > > > environment, having had experiences I have collected memories, and >> > > > developed beliefs and a personality (with all its many sub- >> > > > attributes). >> > >> > > > If I had been born to different parents (or adopted as an infant), >> or >> > > > born at a different time, or born into a different body, or born in >> a >> > > > different place, or in a different culture/society, then I would in >> > > > fact be a different person. >> > >> > > > That is what a "person" is -- a unique, ever-changing, body/mind/ >> > > > personality, that is born, lives for a while, then dies. >> > >> > > > That is what I am. >> > >> > > > . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . >> > >> > > > How clear can you be in pointing out how, exactly, this is >> inaccurate? >> > >> > > > Thank you! >> > >
