By the way, I think its Ms. Kundalini. Not Old Mr. Kundalini you douchebag.
On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 3:08 AM, jp EnlightenmentGuy < [email protected]> wrote: > HEY! Just don't get caught molesting your Kundalini in public!!!! > > Yes, I am familiar with what Old Mr. Kundalini is. > > And is NOT. > > I highly encourage you to get your hands on the three Jed McKenna > books or tapes. > > He is merciless in ripping apart what Spiritual Awaking is NOT. > > Here is one little fun paragraph as part of his disclaimers at the > beginning of the third book, WARFARE... > > BY CONTINUING BEYOND THIS POINT, the reader acknowledges and agrees > that the state of Spiritual Enlightenment discussed herein conveys > upon the seeker-aspirant-victim no benefits, boons, blessings, or > special powers and bears little or no resemblance to assorted New Age > or Eastern varieties widely dispensed under the same name. Orgasmic > euphoria, orgiastic bliss, obscene wealth, perfect health, eternal > peace, angelic ascension, cosmic consciousness, purified aura, astral > projection, pandimensional travel, extrasensory perception, access to > akashic records, profound wisdom, sagely demeanor, radiant > countenance, omniscience, omnipotence, omnipresence and opening of the > third eve are not likely to result. Tuning, harmonizing, balancing, > energizing, reversing or opening of the chakras should not be > expected. The kundalini serpent dwelling at the base of the spine will > not be awakened, poked, prodded, raised, or otherwise molested. > > Merciless. > > Hilarious! > > > > > On Jun 19, 6:09 am, roomsearching <[email protected]> wrote: > > Welcome jPEnlightenment. > > Have you ever had kundalini ? > > I have it. Do you know what it means ? It means lifelong nutty behaviour. > > Your bed will shake at night. You will become a recluse. People will > think > > you are mental and you would even believe them. :) > > > > Have you experienced Self-realization ? > > I have and it takes a minimum of 1 year to get it (excluding my overall > > life-experience and maturity of 28 years at the time and maybe genetics > and > > previous birth karma which I dont believe). > > > > Do you think I am a spiritual person or a Sufi Dervish ? > > Well, before I started this, I was only interested in fucking chicks and > I > > did spend a lot of time trying to pick up girls. > > > > Do you think I do mental-masturbation ? > > I masturbate physically at least once a day because kundalini/Self > > realization for some reason improves health and increases sperm > production. > > The mind is perfectly still, blissful and it does not tolerate mental > > activity. > > > > Who are you ? > > You are a ridiculous and pathetic person. Or you must be an > > over-enthusiastic Indian guy which some people call as noob. > > Are you ? > > > > On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 10:01 AM, Anandanand <[email protected]> wrote: > > > And welcome jpE > > > > > On Jun 19, 1:42 pm, Anandanand <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Rediculous discussion boards? What makes you say that? is it due to > > > > the answers/ responses/ replys you got or you thought so even before > > > > asking the question ? Or is there another reason ? > > > > > > On Jun 19, 1:13 am, jp EnlightenmentGuy < > [email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > This always happens: > > > > > > > I ask an extremely succinct, easy-to-understand, fundamental > question > > > > > and I get one of two responses: > > > > > > > 1. So called "regular" people look at me like I am dumb as a bag of > > > > > rocks for even asking such a silly question about something so > > > > > obvious. "Nobody thinks about this stuff, what is wrong with you? > You > > > > > need to get out and get LAID already!!!" > > > > > > > 2. So called "spiritual" people respond with things that are really > > > > > clear like "Sufi dervishes go Hoo Hooo Hoooo". Or equally as > helpful, > > > > > "So, WHO is asking the question? WHO is it that is confused? > > > > > Whoooo..... Whooooooooo......." which they repeat a zillion times, > > > > > like I haven't heard that a zillion times before. > > > > > > > Will I ever learn? The more I seek answers from others, the more I > > > > > find I am on my own. > > > > > > > Those that aren't "on the path" likely never will be -- trying to > ask > > > > > them about it, or worse -- trying to get them to join in on it -- > > > > > leads to inevitable frustration. There is nothing for me there. > There > > > > > is nothing for me, with 99.9999++% of humanity. > > > > > > > And I suspect almost all people who SEEM to be "on the path", those > > > > > who show up at retreats and Satsangs, or worse -- ridiculous > > > > > discussion boards like this -- are just tourists, interested in > "this > > > > > stuff", or think its cool, another fun mental-masturbation > exercise, > > > > > or this is just another cool spiritual thing they are incorporating > > > > > into their plethora of other neato spiritual thingeys they are > > > > > sampling. Sure seems that way. Seems to be nothing for me here, > > > > > either. > > > > > > > On my own. > > > > > > > Hopefully, finally, DAMMIT, hopefully totally on my > own............... > > > > > > > On Jun 17, 1:26 pm, jp EnlightenmentGuy < > [email protected]> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > I have heard many spiritual teachers just dismissively say things > > > > > > like, > > > > > > > > "You can't be anything that changes, right? You are not the body, > or > > > > > > mind, or memories, or personality or whatever." > > > > > > > > Really? > > > > > > > > I'll bet 99.99%++ of all humans who have ever existed would agree > > > with > > > > > > what is written below. Can you say, clearly, why this is not > > > > > > accurate?? > > > > > > > > . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . > > > > > > > > Who or what am I? I am a body, with certain attributes and > abilities > > > > > > (physical and mental), born to parents, exposed to things in the > > > > > > environment, having had experiences I have collected memories, > and > > > > > > developed beliefs and a personality (with all its many sub- > > > > > > attributes). > > > > > > > > If I had been born to different parents (or adopted as an > infant), or > > > > > > born at a different time, or born into a different body, or born > in a > > > > > > different place, or in a different culture/society, then I would > in > > > > > > fact be a different person. > > > > > > > > That is what a "person" is -- a unique, ever-changing, body/mind/ > > > > > > personality, that is born, lives for a while, then dies. > > > > > > > > That is what I am. > > > > > > > > . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . > > > > > > > > How clear can you be in pointing out how, exactly, this is > > > inaccurate? > > > > > > > > Thank you! >
