Okay The lazy guru ;-)
Sent from an iPhone On 24 Jul 2010, at 09:55, [email protected] wrote: > I am too lazy even for that. > : ) > Sent via BlackBerry from Vodafone > > From: Mark Ty-Wharton <[email protected]> > Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2010 09:55:15 +0100 > To: [email protected]<[email protected]> > Cc: Advaita<[email protected]>; Kuber > Technologies<[email protected]> > Subject: Re: tinnitus > > What drill? Practice? > > Go and see Tony Parsons (or watch his material on YouTube) > > He'll set you straight :-) > > Sent from an iPhone > > On 23 Jul 2010, at 15:43, [email protected] wrote: > >> I've realized today that I will never become enlightened because I don't >> care enough about it to do all the drill, practice. Maybe I am just too lazy. >> Sorry, way too lazy. >> Sent via BlackBerry from Vodafone >> >> From: Mark Ty-Wharton <[email protected]> >> Sender: [email protected] >> Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2010 15:28:40 +0100 >> To: [email protected]<[email protected]> >> Cc: Advaita<[email protected]>; Kuber >> Technologies<[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: tinnitus >> >> Yes but your perception of a second ago does 't happen a second ago it only >> happens NOW >> >> there is no a second ago >> >> It doesn't matter WHAT you THINK because thinking can only ever happen now - >> neurons are only ever firing NOW >> >> Sent from an iPhone >> >> On 23 Jul 2010, at 12:34, [email protected] wrote: >> >>> What is now? All you can percieve is a fraction of a second old. So you're >>> in the past no matter what. Of course you can call it now if you want. But >>> the question is, does it really matter if you're in the past, future or in >>> the now? >>> And if the answer is yes, please tell me why? >>> Sent via BlackBerry from Vodafone >>> >>> From: Mark Ty-Wharton <[email protected]> >>> Sender: [email protected] >>> Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2010 09:07:10 +0100 >>> To: Kuber Technologies<[email protected]> >>> Cc: [email protected]<[email protected]> >>> Subject: Re: tinnitus >>> >>> I can experience now and only now >>> >>> Show me an experience of the past >>> >>> A memory? >>> >>> It happens now >>> >>> A prediction >>> >>> It happens now >>> >>> There is only now >>> >>> The future does not and never will exist >>> >>> The past does not and has never existed >>> >>> There is only now >>> >>> 1891 is happening now >>> >>> And no experience of now can ever be the same >>> >>> Because all experiences of 1891 are separate >>> >>> There are no two like 1891s >>> >>> There are no two identical nows >>> >>> So can now exist without a past and a future? >>> >>> Ask RS >>> >>> I would say in the absence of past and present there is no "real" now >>> >>> Sent from an iPhone >>> >>> On 23 Jul 2010, at 08:56, Kuber Technologies <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 12:56 PM, Mark Ty-Wharton >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> It is either happening or not happening in the moment - it cannot take >>>> place in the future nor did it ever take place in the past there is only >>>> ever now! >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Mark, in the absence of anything as the past and the absence of anything >>>> as the future.........can there be anything as the present. >>>> >>>> Divisions as time(and as space)........are notional constructs required >>>> for happening to appear to happen, in order to display what a happening, >>>> any happening ....... >>>> >>>> ......could be like, if a happening was ever possible. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >
