What drill? Practice? Go and see Tony Parsons (or watch his material on YouTube)
He'll set you straight :-) Sent from an iPhone On 23 Jul 2010, at 15:43, [email protected] wrote: > I've realized today that I will never become enlightened because I don't care > enough about it to do all the drill, practice. Maybe I am just too lazy. > Sorry, way too lazy. > Sent via BlackBerry from Vodafone > > From: Mark Ty-Wharton <[email protected]> > Sender: [email protected] > Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2010 15:28:40 +0100 > To: [email protected]<[email protected]> > Cc: Advaita<[email protected]>; Kuber > Technologies<[email protected]> > Subject: Re: tinnitus > > Yes but your perception of a second ago does 't happen a second ago it only > happens NOW > > there is no a second ago > > It doesn't matter WHAT you THINK because thinking can only ever happen now - > neurons are only ever firing NOW > > Sent from an iPhone > > On 23 Jul 2010, at 12:34, [email protected] wrote: > >> What is now? All you can percieve is a fraction of a second old. So you're >> in the past no matter what. Of course you can call it now if you want. But >> the question is, does it really matter if you're in the past, future or in >> the now? >> And if the answer is yes, please tell me why? >> Sent via BlackBerry from Vodafone >> >> From: Mark Ty-Wharton <[email protected]> >> Sender: [email protected] >> Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2010 09:07:10 +0100 >> To: Kuber Technologies<[email protected]> >> Cc: [email protected]<[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: tinnitus >> >> I can experience now and only now >> >> Show me an experience of the past >> >> A memory? >> >> It happens now >> >> A prediction >> >> It happens now >> >> There is only now >> >> The future does not and never will exist >> >> The past does not and has never existed >> >> There is only now >> >> 1891 is happening now >> >> And no experience of now can ever be the same >> >> Because all experiences of 1891 are separate >> >> There are no two like 1891s >> >> There are no two identical nows >> >> So can now exist without a past and a future? >> >> Ask RS >> >> I would say in the absence of past and present there is no "real" now >> >> Sent from an iPhone >> >> On 23 Jul 2010, at 08:56, Kuber Technologies <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 12:56 PM, Mark Ty-Wharton >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> It is either happening or not happening in the moment - it cannot take >>> place in the future nor did it ever take place in the past there is only >>> ever now! >>> >>> >>> >>> Mark, in the absence of anything as the past and the absence of anything as >>> the future.........can there be anything as the present. >>> >>> Divisions as time(and as space)........are notional constructs required for >>> happening to appear to happen, in order to display what a happening, any >>> happening ....... >>> >>> ......could be like, if a happening was ever possible. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >
