It's those bloody guru types that stare meaningfully into the camera and repeat 
"I am" over and over who crack 'me' up - not really helpful even if they have 
found something

Sent from an iPhone

On 10 Sep 2010, at 04:25, godszen <[email protected]> wrote:

> at the risk of becoming one of those who tries to explain
> the teacher and then "fucks it all up", I will say that
> Nis. taught:
> 
> stay in the sense of "I AM"
> it will lead you to its source
> the Self
> 
> feel free to correct me if you understood
> Nis's. teachings to be different
> 
> On Sep 9, 5:06 pm, Mark Ty-Wharton <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Ah okay
>> 
>> He talks about I am sense though?
>> 
>> Sent from an iPhone
>> 
>> On 10 Sep 2010, at 00:29, godszen <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>> as far as I know Nis. NEVER said; repeat the phrase I AM
>> 
>>> on the contrary, he promoted silent, non-conceptual awareness
>> 
>>> but like you said, it's the people who re-write the history books
>>> who get it wrong, usually to promote their propaganda
>> 
>>> On Sep 9, 4:15 pm, Mark Ty-Wharton <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> Marcus
>> 
>>>> Einstein and Newton were both self-realised, they were clear about reality,
>>>> living from the distinctions of matter and consciousness.
>> 
>>>> It is the scientists that try to learn about the work of Einstein or Newton
>>>> and then teach it to others who fuck it all up.
>> 
>>>> Nisargadatta becomes an icon for all us mere mortals to use as an 
>>>> expression
>>>> of self?
>> 
>>>> I am?
>> 
>>>> FUCK OFF
>> 
>>>> All these stupid videos of gurus on the internet repeating the phrase "I 
>>>> am"
>>>> with this look on their face like "look at ME this really MEANS something
>>>> because I can FEEL it in my heart"
>> 
>>>> DUMB DUMB DUMB DUMB DUMB SHIT
>> 
>>>> Not what the man was saying at all
>> 
>>>> Don't follow the man
>> 
>>>> Look for yourself
>> 
>>>> REAL NOT REAL SAME DIFFERENT SAME
>> 
>>>> Can't be explained in the words you used before
>> 
>>>> So why bother trying
>> 
>>>> Words belittle it
>> 
>>>> I AM?
>> 
>>>> STUPID
>> 
>>>> No you are not - and that isn't it either
>> 
>>>> The quantum self video was good though
>> 
>>>> entertainment
>> 
>>>> On 9 September 2010 10:31, Marcus <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>>>> .
>> 
>>>>> Thanks Roomy,
>> 
>>>>> Quit right.   The real joke is about science  is, it’s arrogance to
>>>>> the principle that we should all worship the God of logic and reason.
>>>>> The great and glorious  2+2=4  world where all is constantly bound by
>>>>> conformity and ridge lines of dualism.   The joke is that science by
>>>>> it’s very delusion of reality can never rest.   Science has no human
>>>>> ability to relax.  Science as an attitude can not choose peace, or
>>>>> surrender with expressions like  “Fuck the world”   Science is doomed
>>>>> to frustration because every conclusion it creates will then create
>>>>> new questions.   A world doom to infinite questions.   That’s why
>>>>> Newton, Einstein and theorist of today torture themselves with finding
>>>>> the mathematical solution of everything.
>> 
>>>>> Thankfully we as humans can reach a stage in our thinking where
>>>>> stillness and silence provide all the answers necessary to know in
>>>>> your heart that this is a beautiful day.
>> 
>>>>> Beyond that, knowledge is futile to the overall objective of having a
>>>>> good day.
>> 
>>>>> Know that,  all this creation in this ever-present moment is, in
>>>>> divine perfection.
>> 
>>>>> It just looks messy sometimes as circumstance works it’s
>>>>> magic.
>> 
>>>>> .
>>>>> On Sep 8, 3:43 pm, roomsearching <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>> consciousness is subtler than space because even that space is formed in
>>>>> the
>>>>>> screen of our consciousness.
>>>>>> This is what Nisargadatta says and i find it is somewhat correct.
>> 
>>>>>> The mystery of the physical universe cannot be solved according to Buddha
>>>>>> because the delve into, the more basic particles you find.
>> 
>>>>>> According to a quantum physicist Amit Goswami, even the world is not real
>>>>>> because our consciousness causes the ever changing wave property of the
>>>>>> universe to collapse and it gives us an illusory stillness. The world is
>>>>> not
>>>>>> still, it is continuously in motion.
>>>>>> But I think the real stillness is probably in our own pure consciousness.
>>>>>> The video is here  ----http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s42mrdhKwRA
>> 
>>>>>> From what I gather so far, consciousness is the most basic property of
>>>>> the
>>>>>> universe. Pure awareness exists whether it is in a body or  even without
>>>>> a
>>>>>> body. Being is not necessarily physical in nature. Being itself is a
>>>>> basic
>>>>>> property of the universe. In fact, the universe appears in this Being. So
>>>>> it
>>>>>> is actually that the universe is inside us rather than we being in the
>>>>>> universe. This being is ----ONE. There is only one pure being. Hence it
>>>>> is
>>>>>> called Brahman or non-duality or Advaita. This is what Ramana says. The
>>>>> Self
>>>>>> supports everything.
>> 
>>>>>> One who gets this point  clearly can continue further and do miracles
>>>>> like
>>>>>> walking on water or be in two different places at the same time(Ramana
>>>>> did
>>>>>> this) or clairvoyance and clairaudience.
>> 
>>>>>> So literally, everything you see is inside you. And that you is not the
>>>>> body
>>>>>> (rolling on the floor laughing.). Get the 'I am the body' idea out of
>>>>> your
>>>>>> head for good. Because it is the first and the last belief that needs to
>>>>> be
>>>>>> eradicated. (laughing out loud and laughing my ass off).
>> 
>>>>>> consciousness cannot be understood by quantum physicists because there
>>>>> are a
>>>>>> lot of erratic problems they have encountered in the deepest levels of
>>>>> the
>>>>>> atom - like one thing being at two places at the same time and such other
>>>>>> stories (laughing out loud).
>> 
>>>>>> This is why I do not take part in your poetic discussions anymore because
>>>>>> this shit is mind boggling and serious business. This is why I was trying
>>>>> to
>>>>>> do astral projection and stuff like that. You can do many things if u
>>>>>> practice stuff using your awareness. (fuck the world)
>> 
>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 12:14 PM, Marcus <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> .
>> 
>>>>>>> Yes,    and what of those atoms which make up my hands and my eye-
>>>>>>> balls.   Do they too have a right to vote in a pretend democracy ??
>> 
>>>>>>> Does the occurrence of an electron within it’s probability wave relate
>>>>>>> to a single atom or many ??
>> 
>>>>>>> If infinity and zero where to have a baby what would it be
>>>>>>> called  ????   don't say One   ???
>> 
>>>>>>> There is no physical measure for conscious awareness.    Atomic
>>>>>>> structure, Newton and Einstein happily record and predict tangible
>>>>>>> pattern behaviours.     These alone rest in a non-human world where
>>>>>>> every solution creates multiple questions.    Great fun and very
>>>>>>> intellectually simulating but does very little to help me understand
>>>>>>> what it is to be me.   The physicality of the phenomena surrounding me
>>>>>>> does nothing to help me gets to grips with love, hate, beauty,
>>>>>>> revelation, stupidity and brilliance, all of which haunt me on a daily
>>>>>>> basis.
>> 
>>>>>>> Science,   Darwinism explains physicality only.  In my head, my mind
>>>>>>> does exists as much as any other existence, a very real world which is
>>>>>>> real to me but science will never recognise.
>> 
>>>>>>> According to cosmology,  Outer space is 80% dark-energy, which
>>>>>>> basically means they don’t know.      Like they don’t know what
>>>>>>> gravity is.   They know how it works but not what it is.
>> 
>>>>>>> Similarly, consciousness.   How does physicality occur,  where does it
>>>>>>> come from and go too ???
>> 
>>>>>>> At a sub-atomic level nothing exists in a traditional sense,  it only
>>>>>>> has a probability of occurring.   Infinite probability is the
>>>>>>> foundation of all science.
>> 
>>>>>>> Now,  decide what it is that brings light into your back yard …………
>>>>>>> &&&
>> 
>>>>>>> .
>> 
>>>>>>> On Sep 8, 9:46 am, Mark Ty-Wharton <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>> So we live in a Universe made of atoms and the atoms that make up my
>>>>>>> physical form are as old as the Universe itself
>> 
>>>>>>>> Q. Do they know that?
>> 
>>>>>>>> Q. Space is the closest thing to a vacuum with just a few hydrogen
>>>>> atoms
>>>>>>> per cubic centimetre (apart from all the debris) - what's that all
>>>>> about
>>>>>>> then?
>> 
>>>>>>>> Q. Quantum theory predicts that no volume of space can be perfectly
>>>>> empty
>>>>>>> - meaning the tiny space between the atoms in your physical being have
>>>>>>> something in them?
>> 
>>>>>>>> In any case, the perfect vacuum is only a philosophical concept and
>>>>> has
>>>>>>> never been observed in practice.
>> 
>>>>>>>> Sent from an iPhone- Hide quoted text -
>> 
>>>>>> - Show quoted text -

Reply via email to